KEVIN PLANKER v. DAYNA KOTT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-1379-09T2

KEVIN PLANKER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

DAYNA KOTT,

Defendant-Respondent.

__________________________________

March 30, 2011

Submitted: March 23, 2011 - Decided:

Before Judges Cuff and Fisher.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County, Docket No. FD-02-1099-05.

Kevin Planker, appellant pro se.

Respondent has not filed a brief.

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff Kevin Planker appeals from an August 25, 2009 order denying his motion to require defendant Dayna Kott to supply him with photographs and information about his son, and another motion to require production of "Docket Records." Plaintiff also appeals from the October 9, 2009 order denying his motion for reconsideration. In this appeal, plaintiff argues that these orders are against the child's best interests, and the judge erred by denying him records for which he has paid.

Having thoroughly reviewed the brief and appendix submitted by plaintiff, we are satisfied that the arguments advanced by plaintiff are without sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). The August 25, 2009 and October 9, 2009 orders are affirmed.