ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR v. PRUDENTIAL
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-1348-10T2
ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PRUDENTIAL,1 INGRID RIGGIO,
and MICHAEL KEMEZIS, ESQ.,
Defendants-Respondents.
_____________________________________________________
March 25, 2011
Argued March 15, 2011 - Decided
Before Judges Espinosa and Skillman.
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Docket
No. L-2668-09.
Assem A. Abulkhair, appellant, argued the cause pro se.
Richard M. Tango argued the cause for respondents (McDermott & McGee, attorneys; Mr. Tango, of counsel; Michael W. Cartelli, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
Plaintiff appeals from an October 1, 2010 order granting summary judgment dismissing his complaint. We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Wertheimer's October 1, 2010 written decision. Plaintiff's arguments do not warrant any additional discussion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E).
Affirmed.
1 Although the caption identified Prudential as a defendant-respondent, the actual defendant was High Point Preferred Insurance Company, which was improperly pled as Prudential.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.