ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR v. PRUDENTIAL

Annotate this Case


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

 

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-1348-10T2




ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR,


Plaintiff-Appellant,


v.


PRUDENTIAL,1 INGRID RIGGIO,

and MICHAEL KEMEZIS, ESQ.,


Defendants-Respondents.


_____________________________________________________

March 25, 2011

 

Argued March 15, 2011 - Decided

 

Before Judges Espinosa and Skillman.

 

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Docket

No. L-2668-09.

 

Assem A. Abulkhair, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

 

Richard M. Tango argued the cause for respondents (McDermott & McGee, attorneys; Mr. Tango, of counsel; Michael W. Cartelli, on the brief).

 

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals from an October 1, 2010 order granting summary judgment dismissing his complaint. We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Wertheimer's October 1, 2010 written decision. Plaintiff's arguments do not warrant any additional discussion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E).

Affirmed.

 

1 Although the caption identified Prudential as a defendant-respondent, the actual defendant was High Point Preferred Insurance Company, which was improperly pled as Prudential.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.