COUNTY OF BERGEN v. IRIS COOPER-SHEPARD

Annotate this Case

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-2511-08T12511-08T1

COUNTY OF BERGEN,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

IRIS COOPER-SHEPARD, and

ROD SHEPARD,

Defendants-Appellants.

_______________________________

 

Argued March 2, 2010 - Decided

Before Judges Fuentes, Gilroy and Simonelli.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Bergen County, Docket No. C-233-06.

Walter M. Luers argued the cause for appellants (Walter M. Luers, LLC, attorneys; Iris Cooper-Shepard and Rod Shepard, on the pro se brief).

Dennis S. Deutsch argued the cause for respondent (Kaufman, Bern & Deutsch, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Deutsch, of counsel; Mr. Deutsch and Marilyn G. Gittleman, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

On May 22, 2008, this court entered an unreported decision affirming the trial court's grant of summary judgment directing defendants Iris Cooper-Shepard and Rod Shepard to remove encroachments from a tract of plaintiff County of Bergen's parklands. County of Bergen v. Iris Cooper-Shepard, No. A-5905-06 (App. Div. May 22, 2008). Although we confirmed the grant of summary judgment, we remanded the matter to enter an amended judgment to include a metes and bounds description of the encroached-upon area. On October 28, 2008, the Supreme Court denied defendants' petition for certification. 196 N.J. 600 (2008).

 
In June 2008, defendants filed a motion seeking to vacate the June 19, 2007 order that granted summary judgment, contending they had discovered new evidence proving plaintiff's complaint was time barred. On September 15, 2008, the trial court entered an order denying defendants' motion. On October 24, 2008, the court denied defendants' motion for reconsideration. On January 9, 2009, defendants filed their notice of appeal. Because the notice of appeal was not filed until 116 days after entry of the September 15, 2008 order, and 77 days after entry of the October 24, 2008 order denying reconsideration, we dismiss the appeal as untimely. See R. 2:4-1(a) (requiring that appeals from final judgments "be taken within 45 days of their entry").

Appeal dismissed.

(continued)

(continued)

2

A-2511-08T1

March 22, 2010

 


Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.