MICHAEL KAPLAN v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-3758-07T33758-07T3
MICHAEL & HELEN KAPLAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION,
Defendant-Respondent.
____________________________________
MORRIS & SANDRA LISMAN-KAPLAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION,
Defendant-Respondent.
______________________________________________
Argued January 27, 2009 - Decided
Before Judges Skillman, Graves and Grall.
On appeal from the Tax Court of New Jersey, Docket Nos. 32-2006 and 39-2006, whose opinion is reported at 23 N.J. Tax 594 (Tax 2008).
Ronald S. Blumstein argued the cause for appellants.
Ramanjit K. Chawla, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Anne Milgram, Attorney General, attorney; Lewis Scheindlin, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Ms. Chawla, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
The judgments of the Tax Court are affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Kuskin's opinion reported in 23 N.J. Tax 594 (Tax 2008).
(continued)
(continued)
2
A-3758-07T3
February 11, 2009
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.