PATRICK J. PANTUSCO v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-2545-07T12545-07T1
PATRICK J. PANTUSCO,
Appellant,
v.
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent.
________________________________________________________________
Submitted September 10, 2008 - Decided
Before Judges Stern and A.A. Rodr guez.
On appeal from a Final Determination of the
New Jersey Department of Corrections.
Patrick J. Pantusco, appellant pro se.
Anne Milgram, Attorney General, attorney for
respondent (Melissa H. Raksa, Deputy Attorney
General, of counsel; Christopher C. Josephson,
Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
Patrick J. Pantusco appeals from the final administrative determination of the Department of Corrections denying his claim of entitlement to work time and commutation credits to reduce his thirty-year mandatory minimum sentence imposed for murder. See State v Pantusco, 330 N.J. Super. 424, 429 (App. Div. 2000). However, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3b and N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.51(a) make clear that these credits do not reduce the mandatory minimum or parole ineligibility term of a sentence. See Merola v. Department of Corrections, 285 N.J. Super. 501, 509-10 (App. Div. 1995), certif. denied, 143 N.J. 519 (1996).
Pantusco is entitled to Rule 3:21-8 jail time credit to reduce the minimum term, State v. Grate, 311 N.J. Super. 456, 458 (App. Div. 1998), but he received them.
The final administrative determination is affirmed.
(continued)
(continued)
2
A-2545-07T1
September 25, 2008
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.