RAJESHWAR SINGH YADAV et al. v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST WINDSOR

Annotate this Case

 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-1160-06T51160-06T5

RAJESHWAR SINGH YADAV

and ROOPA YADAV,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs.

TOWNSHIP OF WEST WINDSOR,

Defendant-Respondent.

__________________________________

 

Argued: October 11, 2007 - Decided October 22, 2007

Before Judges Cuff and Lisa.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Mercer County, Docket No. L-1066-06.

Rajeshwar Singh Yadav, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Michael W. Herbert argued the cause for respondent (Herbert, Van Ness, Cayci & Goodell, attorneys; Mr. Herbert, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

Plaintiffs Rajeshwar Singh Yadav and Roopa Yadav filed a complaint on April 24, 2006, challenging amendments adopted in 1991 and 1999 to the zoning ordinance of defendant Township of West Windsor that affects property owned by them. Plaintiffs appeal from the July 14, 2006 order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment, the July 27, 2006 order imposing $7600 in fees and costs, and the September 19, 2006 order as corrected by a December 15, 2006 order, denying plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.

Having considered the entire record, we are satisfied that the arguments presented are without sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion. We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Feinberg in her thorough opinions of July 14, 2006 and September 15, 2006.

Affirmed.

(continued)

(continued)

2

A-1160-06T5

October 22, 2007

 


Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.