CHARLES HART v. MR. B WHOLESALE FENCE, INC.
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-6737-04T56737-04T5
CHARLES HART,
Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant,
v.
MR. B WHOLESALE FENCE, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant/
Cross-Respondent,
and
THE JERSEY WHOLESALE FENCE COMPANY,
INC., and Individually and WILLIAM
LOWERY as Executor of the ESTATE
OF DOLORES LOWERY and Individually,
Defendants-Respondents/
Cross-Appellants,
and
ROY LOWERY, as Representative
of THE JERSEY WHOLESALE FENCE CO.,
INC. and Individually,
Defendant-Respondent.
________________________________________________________
Submitted October 18, 2006 - Decided December 18, 2006
Before Judges Winkelstein and Baxter.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Mercer County, L-2320-02.
DuBois, Sheehan, Hamilton and Levin, attorneys for appellant-cross-respondent, Mr. B Wholesale Fence, Inc. (Fred J. Levin, on the brief).
Skaar & Finkelstein, attorneys for respondent-cross-appellant, Charles Hart (Steven H. Finkelstein, on the brief).
Gregory Gogo, attorney for respondent-cross-appellants, The Jersey Wholesale Fence Co. Inc., William Lowery, individually and as Executor of the Estate of Dolores Lowery.
PER CURIAM
In this appeal and two cross-appeals, the parties seek a determination as to the disposition of real property located in Ewing Township, owned by defendant Jersey Wholesale Fence Co., Inc., which twice contracted to sell the property, once to plaintiff Charles Hart and once to co-defendant Mr. B Wholesale Fence Co., Inc., the tenant at the time.
Judge Neil H. Shuster's opinion thoroughly analyzes the facts, and reaches proper conclusions of law. The parties' arguments to the contrary are without merit and do not warrant discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e) (A) & (E). We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Shuster in his comprehensive opinion of July 13, 2005.
Affirmed.
(continued)
(continued)
2
A-6737-04T5
December 18, 2006
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.