DENNIS WITT and LYNN WITT, et al. v. BOROUGH OF MAYWOOD, et al.

(NOTE: This decision was approved by the court for publication.)
This case can also be found at 328 N.J. Super. 343.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
 
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
 
 

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-7229-97T2

DENNIS WITT and LYNN WITT,
Individually and as members
of MAYWOOD PROPERTY OWNERS
Association,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

BOROUGH OF MAYWOOD,

Defendant-Respondent,

and

COMMERCE BANK,

Defendant/Intervenor-Respondent.

___________________________________________________________________

Submitted January 25, 2000 - Decided February 10, 2000
 
Before Judges Pressler, Landau and Ciancia.
 
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, whose opinion is reported at ___ N.J. Super. ___ (Law Div. 2000).
 
Segreto & Segreto, attorneys for appellants (James V. Segreto, of counsel and on the brief).
 
Rupp & Ten Hoeve, attorneys for respondent Borough of Maywood (William F. Rupp, on the brief).
 
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick & Gluck, attorneys for respondent Commerce Bank (James A. Farber, on the brief).
 
PER CURIAM

Plaintiffs Dennis Witt and Lynn Witt, individually and as members of Maywood Property Owners Association appeal from paragraphs one and two of a final judgment dated June 30, 1998 that dismissed with prejudice the consolidated complaints in Witt v. Borough of Maywood, Docket No. L-7444-96 and Witt v. Borough of Maywood, Docket No. L-2481-97. The dismissed complaints challenged the validity of a re-zoning ordinance and an exchange of easement ordinance adopted by the Borough.
Upon review of the arguments raised on appeal, we affirm, substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Jonathan Harris in his comprehensive opinion reported at ___ N.J. Super. ___ (Law Div. 2000).