D.O. V. R.B., T.B., & B.R.B.

(NOTE: This decision was approved by the court for publication.)
This case can also be found at 317 N.J. Super. 323.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
 
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
 

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
A-2288-97T5

D.O.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

T.B., R.B. and B.R.B.,

Defendants-Respondents.
_________________________________

Argued: December 2, 1998 - Decided: December 29, 1998

Before Judges King, Wallace and Newman.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Sussex County, whose decision is reported at __ N.J. Super. __ (Ch. Div. 1997)

David J. Weaver argued the cause for appellant (Trapasso, Dolan & Hollander, attorneys; John D. Williams, on the brief).

S. M. Chris Franzblau argued the cause for respondents (Franzblau Dratch, attorneys; Mr. Franzblau, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

We affirm Judge Conforti's decision dismissing the complaint for the reasons expressed in his written opinion of November 7, 1997. He soundly exercised his discretion in rejecting plaintiff's claimed right to subject involuntarily his alleged adult offspring to genetic blood testing. See M.V. v. N.H., 252 N.J. Super 420, 429 (App. Div. 1991); see also Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110, 124, 105 L. Ed. 2d 91, 106 (1989).

- -