Philadelphia v. Stadler

Annotate this Case

173 N.J. Super. 235 (1980)

413 A.2d 996

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HENRY H. STADLER, SALVATORE DIMARTINO, JOSEPH A. SULPIZIE, JAMES SPROULES AND JAMES M. MCCULLOGH, JR., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 1, 1980.

Decided April 18, 1980.

Before Judges FRITZ, KOLE and LANE.

William S. Ruggierio argued the cause for appellant (Ruggierio & Freeman, attorneys).

Charles Crabbe Thomas argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment essentially for the reasons given in Judge Wells' published opinion. Philadelphia v. Stadler, 164 N.J. Super. 281 (Cty.D.Ct. 1978). See, also, Philadelphia v. Smith, 82 N.J. 429 (1980), aff'g 169 N.J. Super. 156 (App.Div. 1979).

We find no merit to any of the contentions raised on this appeal as grounds for reversal.

Affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.