State v. Vela-Montes
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Nebraska Advance Sheets 530 283 nebraska reports undisputed activities on the property violate the covenants. Having concluded that the Burdens activities are a violation, summary judgment was appropriate. CONCLUSION The decision of the district court is affirmed. McCormack, J., not participating. Affirmed. State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Victor Vela-Montes, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed March 23, 2012. No. S-10-1043. Petition for further review from the Court of Appeals, Irwin, Cassel, and Pirtle, Judges, on appeal thereto from the District Court for Douglas County, J. Michael Coffey, Judge. Judgment of Court of Appeals affirmed. Daniel R. Stockmann, of Dunn & Stockmann, L.L.O., for appellant. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, and Kimberly A. Klein for appellee. Heavican, C.J., Wright, Connolly, Stephan, McCormack, and Miller-Lerman, JJ. P er Curiam. Having reviewed the briefs and record and having heard oral arguments, we conclude on further review that the decision of the Nebraska Court of Appeals in State v. Vela-Montes, 19 Neb. App. 378, 807 N.W.2d 544 (2011), is correct, and accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed as modified the ruling of the district court. Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
