In re Interest of A.M.
Annotate this CaseIn the early 1990’s, a jury found A.M. guilty of first-degree sexual assault, and the court sentenced him to prison. Shortly before his release in 2008, the State filed a petition under the Sex Offender Commitment Act (SOCA) to have A.M. declared a dangerous sex offender and committed to inpatient care. The Mental Health Board (Board) found by clear and convincing evidence that A.M. was a dangerous sex offender but that neither voluntary hospitalization nor other treatment alternatives would prevent him from reoffending. A.M. appealed the Board’s decision to the district court, “asserting a litany of constitutional and evidentiary errors.” The district court rejected A.M.’s claims, and affirmed the Board’s decision to have A.M. committed. After a thorough review of the Board’s deliberations and the district court’s record, the Supreme Court found many of A.M.’s issues raised on appeal meritless. However, the Court remanded the case to the Board for further evidentiary findings for the record.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.