Brook Valley Ltd. Part. v. Mutual of Omaha Bank
Annotate this CaseAppellant Brook Valley Limited Partnership (BVLP) filed suit at the district court in 2004 against Mutual Omaha Bank over loans made by the bank. The loans were secured by a partnership property. The real property was ultimately sold to cover payments on the loans. The issue at court was whether the agreements that established the partnerships allowed the partners to bring lawsuits. Though they were nearly identical, the district court determined that under the agreements, certain partners were not empowered to authorize lawsuits. As a result, the court concluded BVLP lacked standing to sue the Bank, and dismissed the case. BVLP appealed. After a review of the partnership agreements at issue in the district court, the Supreme Court found that the successor partners were given the authority to sue. The Court reversed the district court’s decision and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.