Koerner v. Perrella

Annotate this Case

328 N.W.2d 473 (1982)

213 Neb. 189

Russell L. KOERNER, Appellant, v. Rochelle A. PERRELLA, Appellee.

No. 44046.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

December 30, 1982.

*474 William L. Gilmore and Debra K. Lyford of McArthur, Lamb, Lyford, Gilmore & Janssen, Lincoln, for appellant.

Patrick W. Healey of Healey, Brown, Wieland, Kluender, McCord & Atwood, Lincoln, for appellee.

KRIVOSHA, C.J., WHITE, and CAPORALE, JJ., and MURPHY and WHITEHEAD, District Judges.

WHITEHEAD, District Judge.

This is an action for damages and personal injuries resulting from an automobile-motorcycle collision. Plaintiff Koerner, in his petition, alleges that the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the accident and resulting injury. Defendant Perrella, in her answer, alleged that the proximate cause of the collision and the resulting injuries was the negligence of the plaintiff. The matter was tried to a jury and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant Perrella. The plaintiff has appealed.

The collision involved in this case occurred on Cotner Boulevard near the intersection of 64th Street and Cotner Boulevard. On August 7, 1979, at approximately 4:15 p.m., the defendant was operating her automobile, a green 1975 AMC Gremlin, southbound on Cotner Boulevard, heading toward her apartment at 6425 Dudley Street. The plaintiff was traveling in the same direction, with the defendant's automobile in front of him while he was riding on his motorcycle. Defendant testified it was her intention to pull in a driveway located on the west side of Cotner between Orchard and Dudley Streets which led to a parking lot immediately adjacent to her apartment.

The parties proceeded along at a point where the southbound lane begins to widen to provide for a left turn lane onto Dudley Street. The plaintiff testified that the defendant's automobile appeared to move to the left. The defendant then turned her automobile sharply, making a right-hand turn into the driveway. The plaintiff, who was in the southbound lane, collided with the defendant's vehicle, the plaintiff's motorcycle colliding with the right passenger door at a point near the hinges. The plaintiff testified that there were no turn signals or any warning; the defendant testified that prior to the accident she had slowed to about 10 miles per hour, that her turn signals were working, and that she automatically uses her turn signals.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.