State v. Strizich
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the district court convicting Defendant of aggravated burglary, criminal trespass to property, and criminal possession of dangerous drugs, holding that there was no error in the proceedings below.
On appeal, Defendant challenged the district court's admission of flight evidence and its jury instructions on the mental state elements of the charged offenses. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) Defendant failed to establish that the admission of the flight evidence prejudiced him or violated his right to a fair trial; and (2) Defendant failed to demonstrate plain error in the district court's mental state instructions.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.