State v. Llamas
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s denial of Defendant’s motion to dismiss the criminal charges against her for failure to provide a speedy trial, holding that Defendant did not demonstrate entitlement to dismissal of the charges.
Defendant was charged with felony robber, felony possession of dangerous drugs, and use of a firearm. Defendant later moved to dismiss the charges for lack of a speedy trial. The district court denied the motion to dismiss. Defendant pleaded guilty to felony robbery with the use of a weapon. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) the district court did not err in denying Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to provide a speedy trial; and (2) Defendant’s claim that she received ineffective assistance of counsel in regard to her motion to dismiss was not properly raised on appeal.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.