State v. Allen
Annotate this CaseThe State charged Defendant with thirty-five counts of violating an order of protection. Defendant moved to dismiss thirty-four of the thirty-five counts on the grounds that the offenses were a continuing course of conduct rather than a series of individual crimes. The district court denied the motion. Defendant then entered a plea agreement with the State under which the State dropped all charges of violating an order of protection. Defendant instead entered a guilty plea to one count of felony stalking. Defendant appealed the denial of his motion to dismiss. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the district court correctly denied Defendant’s motion to dismiss.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.