State v. Dobrowski
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of criminal production or manufacture of dangerous drugs. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in instructing the jury on the theory of accountability when the State did not charge Defendant with accountability in the information; (2) the district court did not abuse its discretion when it allowed the State to admit Defendant’s medical marijuana provider application during rebuttal; (3) the prosecutor’s statements during closing argument were not improper; and (4) the district court acted within the proper bounds of its discretion when it denied Defendant’s request for a surrebuttal closing argument.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.