TIMIS v YOUNG

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. 00-232 2001 MT 63A ______________ JIM TIMIS and CONNIE TIMIS, both individually and on behalf of their minor daughter, CHARDEE TIMIS, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MARK YOUNG, JOHN YOUNG and ROSE YOUNG, d/b/a ROSE'S DAY CARE, Defendants and Respondents. ORDER ______________ On April 27, 2001, appellants filed herein a petition for rehearing, and on May 4, 2001, respondents filed their objection thereto. The Court having considered the same, IT IS ORDERED that the first sentence of Paragraph 3 of this Court's opinion dated April 18, 2001, is hereby amended to read: "Later, the Timises repudiated the agreement and refused to sign the settlement documents." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is denied. file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm (1 of 2)3/27/2007 4:24:22 PM file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm DATED this 15th day of May, 2001. /S/ KARLA M. GRAY /S/ W. WILLIAM LEAPHART /S/ TERRY N. TRIEWEILER /S/ JAMES C. NELSON /S/ JIM REGNIER file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm (2 of 2)3/27/2007 4:24:22 PM

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.