ESTATE OF HARBAUGH

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

No. 81-132 I N THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF M N A A OTN 1981 I N THE MATTER O THE ESTATE OF F DAVID LARRY HARBAUGH, D e c e a s e d . Appeal from: D i s t r i c t Court of t h e Sixteenth J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , I n and f o r t h e County o f G a r f i e l d H o n o r a b l e A. B. M a r t i n , J u d g e p r e s i d i n g . C o u n s e l o f Record: For Appellant: N i c k o l a s C . Murnion a r g u e d , J o r d a n , Montana F o r Respondent: B. M i l e s L a r s o n a r g u e d , S t a n f o r d , Montana Submitted: O c t o b e r 23, 1 9 8 1 ~ e c i d e d : J a n u a r y 1 4 , 1982 Filed: JMj 14 1983, J u s t i c e F r e d J. Weber d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of t h e Court. Mr. The G a r f i e l d County Bank (Bank) of J o r d a n , Montana, f i l e d a c r e d i t o r ' s c l a i m a g a i n s t t h e e s t a t e o f David L a r r y Harbaugh ( L a r r y Harbaugh). The e s t a t e d i s a l l o w e d t h e c l a i m . The Bank p e t i t i o n e d t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t of t h e S i x t e e n t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , G a r f i e l d County, Montana, f o r a l l o w a n c e of t h e claim. The p e t i t i o n was d e n i e d and t h e Bank a p p e a l e d . W e r e v e r s e t h e D i s t r i c t Court. I n May, 1976, R o b e r t Baugh, A l t a Baugh, and L a r r y Harbaugh s i g n e d a p r o m i s s o r y n o t e w i t h t h e G a r f i e l d County Bank i n t h e amount o f $15,000. The n o t e was p a y a b l e i n monthly i n s t a l l m e n t s of $198.23 u n t i l 1986, when t h e b a l a n c e was due. The p r o m i s s o r y n o t e c o n t a i n e d t h e f o l l o w i n g l a n g u a g e : "Upon any d e f a u l t i n t h e payment of i n t e r e s t o r p r i n c i p a l , o r i f t h e h o l d e r h e r e o f a t any t i m e i n good f a i t h b e l i e v e s t h a t t h e p r o s p e c t of due and p u n c t u a l payment of t h i s n o t e i s i m p a i r e d , t h i s n o t e s h a l l become immediately due and p a y a b l e a t t h e o p t i o n of t h e h o l d e r hereof." T h e p r o c e e d s of t h e n o t e w e r e used by R o b e r t Baugh and A l t a Baugh t o b u i l d a basement, w e l l , and sewer on t e n a c r e s of l a n d h e l d i n j o i n t t e n a n c y by P a u l Harbaugh, C o r n e l i a Harbaugh and L a r r y Harbaugh. P a u l Harbaugh and C o r n e l i a Harbaugh a r e t h e p a r e n t s of L a r r y Harbaugh. The t e n a c r e s of l a n d were l e a s e d t o R o b e r t Baugh p u r s u a n t t o a w r i t t e n l e a s e f o r a t e r m of n i n e t y - n i n e y e a r s . The l e a s e c o n t a i n e d a c l a u s e s p e c i f i c a l l y f o r b i d d i n g t h e s u b l e t t i n g of t h e p r e m i s e s by R o b e r t Baugh w i t h o u t t h e p r i o r c o n s e n t of t h e lessors. The l a n d on which t h e basement, w e l l and sewer a r e l o c a t e d i s i n t h e m i d s t of t h e r a n c h owned by P a u l Harbaugh and C o r n e l i a Harbaugh. A t t h e t i m e t h e l o a n w a s made, Rob c t Baugh and L a r r y Harbaugh i n t e n d e d t o become p a r t n e r s i n t h e r a n c h i n g b u s i n e s s on t h e Harbaugh r a n c h . R o b e r t Baugh i n i t i a l l y a p p r o a c h e d t h e Harbaughs a b o u t o b t a i n i n g t h e l o a n a n d w a s d i r e c t e d t o g o t o t h e G a r f i e l d County Bank. The G a r f i e l d County Bank i n s i s t e d t h a t L a r r y Harbaugh c o s i g n t h e p r o m i s s o r y n o t e s i n c e R o b e r t Baugh was u n a b l e t o g i v e any s e c u r i t y f o r t h e note. A f t e r t h e b a s e m e n t , w e l l and s e w e r w e r e b u i l t , R o b e r t Baugh and L a r r y Harbaugh d e c i d e d n o t t o become p a r t n e r s and R o b e r t Baugh moved t o J o r d a n . L a r r y Harbaugh d i e d on November 5, 1 9 7 9 , a n d t h e p r o b a t e o f t h e e s t a t e was opened on November 26, 1979. On December 6 , 1979, t h e f i r s t n o t i c e t o c r e d i t o r s was p u b l i s h e d i n t h e Jordan Tribune. The G a r f i e l d County Bank f i l e d a c l a i m a g a i n s t t h e e s t a t e o f L a r r y Harbaugh on F e b r u a r y 1 3 , 1980. The c l a i m was b a s e d upon t h e p r o m i s s o r y n o t e and w a s i n t h e amount of $11,054.78. The c r e d i t o r ' s c l a i m was d i s a l l o w e d on J u n e 23, 1980, a n d a p e t i t i o n f o r a l l o w a n c e o f t h e c l a i m was f i l e d by t h e G a r f i e l d County Bank on J u l y 25, 1980. H e a r i n g on t h e p e t i t i o n was had on J a n u a r y 6, 1981. The D i s t r i c t Court refused t o g r a n t t h e Bank's p e t i t i o n f o r a l l o w a n c e of the c l a i m , and t h i s a p p e a l f o l l o w e d . The G a r f i e l d County Bank h a s r a i s e d two i s s u e s i n i t s appeal: (1) Did t h e d e a t h o f L a r r y Harbaugh e s t a b l i s h a b a s i s f o r invoking t h e a c c e l e r a t i o n c l a u s e of t h e promissory note? (2) Did t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t e r r by c o m p l e t e l y e x o n e r a t i n g t h e e s t a t e of L a r r y Harbaugh from l i a b i l i t y on t h e n o t e ? W e find t h a t the f i r s t issue is not properly before t h i s Court. The Bank a r g u e d b o t h a t t h e h e a r i n g below a n d o n a p p e a l t h a t s e c t i o n 30-1-208, MCA, and t h e a c c e l e r a t i o n c l a u s e of t h e n o t e g a v e t h e Bank t h e r i g h t t o d e c l a r e t h e n o t e due and p a y a b l e i f t h e Bank had a good f a i t h b e l i e f t h a t t h e d e a t h of L a r r y Harbaugh had i m p a i r e d t h e p r o s p e c t o f payment of t h e n o t e . However, n e i t h e r t h e c l a i m a g a i n s t t h e e s t a t e n o r t h e p e t i t i o n f o r a l l o w a n c e of c l a i m r e q u e s t e d more t h a n t h e e s t a b l i s h m e n t of t h e e x i s t e n c e of t h e d e b t c r e a t e d by t h e s i g n i n g of t h e p r o m i s s o r y n o t e . The Bank d i d n o t a s k t h a t t h e e n t i r e b a l a n c e be d e c l a r e d due and owing. T h e r e f o r e , t h e f i r s t i s s u e r a i s e d by t h e Bank i s n o t p r o p e r l y b e f o r e u s and w e d e c l i n e t o r u l e upon it. A s t o t h e second i s s u e , w e f i n d t h a t t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t e r r e d by i s s u i n g i t s o r d e r which, i n e f f e c t , c o m p l e t e l y e x o n e r a t e d t h e Harbaugh e s t a t e from any l i a b i l i t y under t h e note. S i n c e Harbaugh s i g n e d t h e i n s t r u m e n t f o r t h e p u r p o s e of l e n d i n g h i s name t o a n o t h e r p a r t y t o t h e i n s t r u m e n t , h e was a n accommodation maker. S e c t i o n 30-3-415(1), MCA. I n Montana a n accommodation maker i s p r i m a r i l y l i a b l e on t h e i n s t r u m e n t which h e s i g n s . " S u b s e c t i o n (1) r e c o g n i z e s t h a t a n accommodat i o n p a r t y i s always a s u r e t y (which i n c l u d e s a g u a r a n t o r ) , and it i s h i s o n l y d i s t i n g u i s h i n g f e a t u r e . He d i f f e r s from o t h e r s u r e t i e s o n l y i n t h a t h i s l i a b i l i t y i s on t h e i n s t r u m e n t and h e i s a s u r e t y f o r a n o t h e r p a r t y t o i t . H i s o b l i g a t i o n i s t h e r e f o r e d e t e r m i n e d by t h e c a p a c i t y i n which he s i g n s . An accommodation maker o r a c c e p t o r i s bound - -e i n s t r u m e n t on t h w i t h o u t a n y r e s o r t 7 0 -s p r i n c i p a l , w h i l e a n - hi accommodation i n d o r s e r may b e l i a b l e o n l y a f t e r p r e s e n t m e n t , n o t i c e of d i s h o n o r and p r o t e s t . " O f f i c i a l Comment, s e c t i o n 30-3-415, MCA, (Annot a t i o n s ) (emphasis s u p p l i e d ) . A accommodation maker was a l s o p r i m a r i l y l i a b l e on t h e n i n s t r u m e n t p r i o r t o t h e a d o p t i o n of t h e Uniform Commercial Code. A s t h i s C o u r t s a i d i n M e r c h a n t s ' Nat. ( 1 9 2 1 ) , 59 Mont. 280, 196 P . ". . . Bank v. Smith 523: t h e f a c t t h a t L e e signed t h e n o t e witho u t r e c e i v i n g any p a r t of t h e c o n s i d e r a t i o n , and f o r t h e purpose o n l y of l e n d i n g h i s name t o Smith, d o e s n o t a l t e r h i s s i t u a t i o n . H e i s l i a b l e n o t w i t h s t a n d i n g t h e bank, a t t h e t i m e it t o o k t h e n o t e , knew him t o be o n l y a n I n o t h e r words, t h e accommodation p a r t y . f a c t t h a t he i s a n accommodation maker g i v e s r i s e t o a d u t y on h i s p a r t t o t h e h o l d e r f o r v a l u e , no g r e a t e r , o r l e s s o r d i f f e r e n t , t h a n t h a t imposed upon a maker who r e c e i v e d v a l u e . " 59 Mont. a t 292, 196 P . a t 525. . . The d e a t h of L a r r y Harbaugh d i d n o t e x t i n g u i s h h i s obligation. N e i t h e r t h e U.C.C., n o r t h e s t a t u t e s on g u a r a n t y and s u r e t y s h i p , p r o v i d e t h a t d e a t h r e s u l t s i n t h e d i s c h a r g e o r e x o n e r a t i o n of one i n L a r r y Harbaugh's p o s i t i o n . s e c t i o n s 30-3-601, MCA; See T i t l e 28, c h a p t e r 11, p a r t 2 , MCA; and T i t l e 28, c h a p t e r 11, p a r t 4 , MCA. I n d e e d , t h e common law r u l e i s t h a t d e a t h d o e s n o t e x o n e r a t e a s u r e t y . r e l . Wilhelm v. Chain ( 1 9 3 7 ) , 300 U.S. 31, 57 S . C t . U.S. ex 394, 81 The D i s t r i c t C o u r t s h o u l d have found t h a t t h e e s t a t e owed t h e b a l a n c e under t h e t e r m s of t h e p r o m i s s o r y n o t e , t h a t o b l i g a t i o n b e i n g a s a n accommodation maker. w i t h s e c t i o n 72-3-805(2), claim i n f u l l . I n accordance t h e c o u r t s h o u l d have a l l o w e d t h e W e n o t e t h a t such a l l o w a n c e d o e s n o t n e c e s s a r i l y r e q u i r e payment i n f u l l o r i n p a r t by t h e e s t a t e . The payment of c l a i m s i s p r o v i d e d f o r i n s e c t i o n s 72-3808, 72-3-814 and 72-3-815, MCA. T h e r e a r e a number of a l t e r n a t i v e s available t o t h e personal representative with r e g a r d t o payment. A s a n example, t h e p e r s o n a l r e p r e s e n t a t i v e may s e e k t o compromise t h e o b l i g a t i o n of t h e e s t a t e . The p e r s o n a l r e p r e s e n t a t i v e , o f c o u r s e , may pay t h e same i n cash. I n t h i s i n s t a n c e , i t a p p e a r s t h a t s e c t i o n 72-3-814(2) is particularly appropriate. Under t h a t s e c t i o n , t h e p e r s o n a l r e p r e s e n t a t i v e could p e t i t i o n t h e c o u r t i n a s p e c i a l proceeding f o r t h a t p u r p o s e t o a r r a n g e f o r p o s s i b l e payment on t h e happening of t h e c o n t i n g e n c y t h a t t h e primary maker d e f a u l t s i n payment, w i t h s u c h payment t o b e s e c u r e d by a m o r t g a g e o r o t h e r s e c u r i t y on e s t a t e p r o p e r t y . Such a n a r r a n g e m e n t would a l l o w d i s t r i b u t i o n of a s s e t s w i t h o u t a r e q u i r e d a d v a n c e payment o f t h e n o t e , and y e t would g i v e t h e Bank t h e s e c u r i t y which i s r e a s o n a b l y n e c e s s a r y i f t h e r e i s t o b e a postponement i n t i m e o f payment. Such a p r o c e d u r e would a l l o w t h e makers R o b e r t and A l t a Baugh t o c o n t i n u e t o make t h e payments f o r which t h e y a r e r e s p o n s i b l e . The o r d e r o f t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t d i s a l l o w i n g t h e c l a i m is reversed. The D i s t r i c t C o u r t i s d i r e c t e d t o e n t e r i t s order allowing t h e claim, s u b j e c t t o t h e f u r t h e r determination o f t h e manner o f payment i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e p r o b a t e procedures. W e Concur: Chief J u s t i c e I concur i n the r e s u l t . Chief J u s t i c e

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.