STATE EX REL JENNINGS v DISTRICT

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

No. 14328 IN THE SUPREME c m OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1978 STATE ex rel., RIcHAFCl K. JENNXS, Relator, THE DISTRICT COUET OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT e t al., Respondents. Counsel o f Record: For Relator: Jack Scanlon argued, Anaconda, Montana For Respondents: Knight, Dahocd, mckay a d IWLean, Anaconda, Montana Conde Mackay argued, Anaconda, Wntana Suhnitted: Filed: && j. - -Y w July 21, 1978 J u s t i c e John Conway H a r r i s o n d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of t h e Court. Mr. K. J e n n i n g s , h a s a p p l i e d t o t h i s C o u r t Relator, ~ i c h a r d f o r a w r i t of supervisory c o n t r o l t o be d i r e c t e d t o t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t of t h e T h i r d J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , Deer Lodge County, and t o Honorable R o b e r t J. Boyd and Honorable Arnold Olsen. The a p p l i c a t i o n c o n c e r n s j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r c h i l d c u s t o d y p r o c e e d i n g s i n i t i a t e d i n Montana by r e l a t o r ' s former w i f e , Sandra J e n n i n g s , a s a r e s p o n s e t o s i m i l a r p r o c e e d i n g s b r o u g h t by r e l a t o r i n Iowa. R i c h a r d and Sandra J e n n i n g s were m a r r i e d i n Iowa on J u l y 2 5 , 1976. I t w a s Sandra J e n n i n g s ' second m a r r i a g e . Some two months l a t e r , t h e y were s e p a r a t e d . The husband, as p e t i t i o n e r , was g r a n t e d a d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n of m a r r i a g e o n F e b r u a r y 2 4 , 1977, t h r e e d a y s a f t e r t h e b i r t h of t h e c o u p l e ' s d a u g h t e r . The d e c r e e awarded c u s t o d y of t h e c h i l d t o t h e wife. A t that time, s h e a l s o had c u s t o d y o f h e r s o n under a d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n from h e r p r e v i o u s m a r r i a g e . During t h e e n s u i n g months, a number o f problems a r o s e w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e h u s b a n d ' s v i s i t a t i o n r i g h t s and t h e p a r t i e s r e t u r n e d t o t h e Iowa c o u r t on two o c c a s i o n s f o r f u r t h e r c l a r i f i c a t i o n of t h e s e r i g h t s . On October 3 , 1977, t h e w i f e moved t o Anaconda, Nontana, t o e s c a p e what s h e h a s termed t h e h u s b a n d ' s " a b u s e and h a r a s s m e n t " . After she moved, t h e husband r e t u r n e d t o t h e Iowa c o u r t and r e c e i v e d a n o r d e r t e r m i n a t i n g h i s c h i l d s u p p o r t payments and g r a n t i n g him c u s t o d y of t h e c o u p l e ' s d a u g h t e r . A short t i m e later, t h e w i f e ' s f i r s t husband r e t u r n e d t o t h e Iowa c o u r t from h i s home i n Nebraska and r e c e i v e d a s i m i l a r o r d e r w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e c h i l d of t h e w i f e ' s m a r r i a g e t o him. n o t a t t e n d e i t h e r of t h e s e hearings. The w i f e d i d On ~ p r i 21, 1978, r e l a t o r f i l e d t h e Iowa o r d e r modil f y i n g c u s t o d y w i t h t h e C l e r k of t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t , Deer Lodge County, Montana, s o t h a t i t m i g h t b e e n f o r c e d i n t h i s s t a t e p u r s u a n t t o s e c t i o n 61-416, R.C.M. 1947 (Supp. 1 9 7 7 ) . On t h e h u s b a n d ' s m o t i o n , t h e Honorable Arnold O l s e n , s i t t i n g i n t h e a b s e n c e of Honorable R o b e r t J. Boyd, i s s u e d a n o r d e r g i v i n g f u l l f a i t h and c r e d i t t o t h e Iowa p r o c e e d i n g s and d i r e c t i n g t h e w i f e t o s u r r e n d e r c u s t o d y of t h e d a u g h t e r t o t h e husband. The w i f e w a s never s e r v e d w i t h t h i s o r d e r . On May 3 , 1978, t h e w i f e p e t i t i o n e d t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r a h e a r i n g c h a l l e n g i n g t h e j u r i s d i c t i o n of t h e Iowa d i s t r i c t c o u r t t o modify t h e d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n as t o custody. T h a t s a m e d a y , Judge O l s e n a g a i n o r d e r e d t h e w i f e t o r e l i n q u i s h c u s t o d y of h e r d a u g h t e r . However, Judge Boyd, having r e t u r n e d t o t h e bench, i s s u e d a temporary r e s t r a i n i n g o r d e r p r o h i b i t i n g t h e husband from t a k i n g c u s t o d y of t h e daughter u n t i l a hearing could be held concerning t h e matter. On May 9, t h e w i f e p e t i t i o n e d t h e c o u r t t o modify t h e Iowa d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n and r e t u r n l e g a l c u s t o d y of h e r d a u g h t e r t o her. T h a t same d a y , c o u n s e l f o r r e l a t o r f i l e d a motion s e e k i n g f u l l f a i t h and c r e d i t f o r t h e Iowa o r d e r o b t a i n e d by t h e w i f e ' s f i r s t husband w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e w i f e ' s son. The f i r s t husband l a t e r o b t a i n e d c u s t o d y of t h e s o n t h r o u g h habeas c o r p u s p r o c e e d i n g s i n t h e S t a t e of Washington where t h e w i f e had t a k e n t h e s o n f o r m e d i c a l t r e a t m e n t . On May 30, r e l a t o r moved t h a t t h e temporary r e s t r a i n i n g o r d e r b e quashed, t h e p e t i t i o n f o r m o d i f i c a t i o n d i s m i s s e d , and t h e A p r i l 21 o r d e r e n f o r c e d . Judge Boyd d e n i e d t h e h u s b a n d ' s motion and o r d e r e d him t o s e e k a w r i t o f s u p e r v i s o r y c o n t r o l i n t h i s C o u r t t o d e t e r m i n e t h e q u e s t i o n of jurisdiction. W e hold t h a t supervisory c o n t r o l i s n o t a n e c e s s a r y remedy under t h e s e f a c t s t o d e t e r m i n e t h e r e l i e f s o u g h t by r e l a t o r . T h i s C o u r t , i n S t a t e e x r e l . Woodahl v . D i s t r i c t C o u r t ( 1 9 7 5 ) , 166 Mont. 31, 38, 530 P.2d 780, 785, h e l d : " * * * when t h e f a c t s c l e a r l y show t h a t a p a r t y h a s no p l a i n , speedy o r a d e q u a t e remedy a t law, and when t h e r e i s no r i g h t of a p p e a l from a d i s t r i c t c o u r t ' s o r d e r , a w r i t of s u p e r v i s o r y c o n t r o l may i s s u e s o t h a t t h e d e c i s i o n of t h e lower c o u r t may b e reviewed by t h e Montana Supreme C o u r t " . F u r t h e r , t h i s C o u r t , i n P e t i t i o n of C h a r l e s Waite, Jr. ( 1 9 6 4 ) , 143 Mont. 321, 322, 389 P.2d 407, 408, s t a t e d : " I t i s incumbent f u r t h e r upon p e t i t i o n e r s seeking o r i g i n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n i n t h i s c o u r t t o make a showing of t h e inadequacy o r u n a v a i l a b i l i t y of any o t h e r remedy, e i t h e r i n t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t o r by way of a p p e a l t o t h i s court " . R e l a t o r h a s a p l a i n and speedy remedy a t law a v a i l a b l e t o him by a p p e a l from any a c t i o n of t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t . T h e r e f o r e , t h e a p p l i c a t i o n of r e l a t o r i s d i s m i s s e d w i t h o u t p r e j u d i c e and t h i s matter i s remanded t o t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t of t h e T h i r d J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t f o r s u c h f u r t h e r p r o c e e d i n g s a s i t may deem a p p r o p r i a t e . W e Concur: %,-Jw WdWeq Chief J u s t i c e .- .,>v,%"- 6, , / Justices L' +<&I?) L/ 0 I N T E SUPREME COURT O THE STATE O MONTANA H F F No. 14328 STATE e x r e l . , RICHARD K. JENNINGS, Relator, THE DISTRICT COURT O T E T H I R D F H J U D I C I A L DISTRICT, e t a l . , Respondents. O R D E R Through i n a d v e r t e n c e , t h e Opinion i n t h e above e n t i t l e d c a u s e w a s s i g n e d by J u s t i c e Gene B. Daly i n s t e a d of t h e Honorable P e t e r G. Meloy, D i s t r i c t J u d g e , s i t t i n g f o r J u s t i c e Daly . W e hereby i s s u e a c o r r e c t i o n o r d e r s u b s t i t u t i n g Judge Meloy f o r J u s t i c e Daly. D T D this AE l s d - , day of September, 1978. s - , a p 4 % 4 #Chief Justice t r i c t J u d g e , concu J

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.