MATHIE v MONTANA POWER CO

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

No. 12922 I N T E SUPREME C U T O T E STATE O M N A A H OR F H F OTN 1975 V I R G I N I A MATHIE, P l a i n t i f f and A p p e l l a n t , -vs - THE M N A A P W R C M A Y e t a l . , OTN O E O PN Defendants and Respondents, Appeal from: D i s t r i c t Court o f t h e S i x t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , Honorable J a c k D. Shanstrom, Judge p r e s i d i n g . Counsel o f Record: For ~ ~ ~ e i l: a n t McKeon and Skakles , Anaconda, Montana Gregory J. Skakles argued, Anaconda, Montana F o r Respondent : C o r e t t e , Smith and Dean, B u t t e , Montana Kendrick Smith argued, B u t t e , Montana Submitted: Decided: Filed: Ji'nW 1.2 1973 May 5, 1975 dub 1 2 $!#I J u s t i c e John Conway H a r r i s o n d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of t h e Court Mr. . T h i s i s a n a p p e a l by p l a i n t i f f V i r g i n i a Mathie from a n o r d e r of t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t , Park County, t h e Hon. J a c k Shanstrom, judge p r e s i d i n g , g r a n t i n g summary judgment i n a p e r s o n a l i n j u r y a c t i o n t o d e f e n d a n t Montana Power Company. P l a i n t i f f i s t h e mother o f one Ronnie C h a r l e s H a r r i s who w a s f a t a l l y i n j u r e d on J u n e 2 1 , 1973, w h i l e employed by t h e Brogan Sand and G r a v e l Company. The amended c o m p l a i n t a l l e g e d t h e d e a t h was c a u s e d by t h e n e g l i g e n c e o f d e f e n d a n t Montana Power Company and d e f e n d a n t s A , B , and C , (never i d e n t i f i e d ) . Several allega- t i o n s of n e g l i g e n c e were a l l e g e d a s t o t h e Power Company: (1) I t n e g l i g e n t l y a d v i s e d t h e owner of t h e Sand and G r a v e l Company a s t o t h e p r o p e r method of grounding and w i r i n g t h e c r u s h e r , on which d e c e d e n t was working on o r a t . (2) I t was n e g l i g e n t i n s u p p l y i n g e l e c t r i c i t y t o t h e c r u s h e r when i t knew, o r s h o u l d have known, t h a t t h e c r u s h e r was i m p r o p e r l y w i r e d and grounded and w a s d a n g e r o u s t o t h o s e who came i n contact with it. (3) That d e f e n d a n t Power Company f a i l e d t o p r o p e r l y i n - s p e c t t h e w i r i n g , grounding and t h e e l e c t r i c a l equipment of t h e Brogan Sand and G r a v e l Company and was n e g l i g e n t i n s u p p l y i n g e l e c t r i c i t y w i t h o u t p r o p e r i n s p e c t i o n of t h e e l e c t r i c a l g r o u n d i n g s , w i r i n g s and a p p l i a n c e s . (4) That i f t h e Power Company d i d i n s p e c t t h e g r o u n d i n g s , w i r i n g and e l e c t r i c a l a p p l i a n c e s , it knew o r s h o u l d have known of t h e dangerous c o n d i t i o n s p r e s e n t e d t o Ronnie Harris and i t was t h e r e f o r e n e g l i g e n t i n s u p p l y i n g e l e c t r i c i t y , i n view of t h e d e f e c t i v e c o n d i t i o n of t h e g r o u n d i n g , w i r i n g and a p p l i a n c e s . (5) That t h e Power Company's n e g l i g e n c e w a s t h e p r o x i m a t e c a u s e of t h e d e a t h o f H a r r i s . --- - *_ - The o n l y t e s t i m o n y i n t h e r e c o r d i s t h e d e p o s i t i o n of r' i - Welch Brogan, owner of t h e g r a v e l p i t , f o r whom H a r r i s w a s working. P l a i n t i f f t o o k t h e d e p o s i t i o n and p l a i n t i f f t a k e s no i s s u e w i t h B r o g a n ' s t e s t i m o n y . A r e a d i n g of B r o g a n ' s t e s t i m o n y r e v e a l e d t h a t he had o p e r a t e d a s a s m a l l g r a v e l company a t Corwin S p r i n g s , Montana, s i n c e 1952. He p u r c h a s e d t h e c r u s h e r i n v o l v e d i n t h e a c c i d e n t i n e i t h e r 1956 o r 1957 and a t t h e t i m e of p u r c h a s e it was a d i e s e l o p e r a t e d e n g i n e which he p e r s o n a l l y c o n v e r t e d t o e l e c t r i c i t y , w i t h t h e h e l p of h i s employees. Brogan d i d n o t know t h e e x a c t d a t e of c o n v e r s i o n b u t a n e x h i b i t , a c o n t r a c t w i t h t h e Montana Power Company t o f u r n i s h e l e c t r i c s e r v i c e , was d a t e d May 7 , 1956. He t e s t i f i e d t h a t t h e l a s t time defendant energized t h e l i n e , brought a b o u t by a highway change c a u s i n g c e r t a i n p o l e s t o be changed, o c c u r r e d i n 1968 and a t t h a t t i m e d e f e n d a n t p u t i n a s e r v i c e p o l e on h i s p r o p e r t y and he p e r s o n a l l y grounded t h e c r u s h e r . Further, t h a t t h e Power Company men were " p r o b a b l y " t h e r e a t t h e t i m e of t h e grounding b u t t h a t t h e y had n o t h i n g t o d o w i t h t h e grounding of t h e c r u s h e r n o r d i d h e a s k them how t o do i t . He t h o u g h t t h a t de- f e n d a n t Power Company knew how t h e c r u s h e r was grounded, b u t t h a t a l l t h e w i r i n g on t h e c r u s h e r s i d e of t h e power p o l e was h i s , and t h a t he d i d a l l t h e work. From t h e i n t e r r o g a t o r i e s propounded by b o t h p a r t i e s and t h e a c c i d e n t r e p o r t s of d e f e n d a n t and t h e Montana Workmen's Comp e n s a t i o n D i v i s i o n , t h e f a c t s of t h e a c c i d e n t a r e found. On t h e day i n v o l v e d Ronnie Harris and a man named John A r a b i a were worki n g i n t h e g r a v e l p i t and o p e r a t i n g t h e c r u s h e r . H a r r i s was on t h e machine and A r a b i a was o p e r a t i n g a f r o n t end l o a d e r w i t h which he was l o a d i n g g r a v e l from t h e p i t i n t o a hopper on t h e end of the crusher. A f t e r f i l l i n g t h e hopper A r a b i a c o u l d n o t s e e H a r r i s on t h e c r u s h e r and t h i n k i n g he had wandered away from t h e s i t e , he g o t o f f t h e l o a d e r and went o v e r t o t h e c r u s h e r t o engage a c l u t c h t o s t a r t t h e machine. When h e s t a r t e d up a l a d d e r on t h e c r u s h e r he g o t a shock and c a l l e d t o have t h e power t u r n e d o f f . S h o r t l y t h e r e a f t e r Harris was found l y i n g i n a s m a l l p o o l of water near t h e crusher. An a u t o p s y r e v e a l e d H a r r i s had d i e d of drowning and t h e r e were no s i g n s o f any e l e c t r i c a l b u r n s on h i s body. On t h e b a s i s of t h e h e r e t o f o r e r e l a t e d f a c t s and p l e a d i n g s , Judge Shanstrom g r a n t e d summary judgment t o d e f e n d a n t Power Company. P l a i n t i f f sets f o r t h o n l y o n e i s s u e on appeal--Did the c o u r t err i n g r a n t i n g summary judgment? T h i s C o u r t h a s r e p e a t e d l y u p h e l d summary judgments where t h e r e c o r d d i s c l o s e s no g e n u i n e i s s u e a s t o any m a t e r i a l f a c t , h o l d i n g t h a t t h e burden i s on t h e o p p o s i n g p a r t y t o p r e s e n t e v i d e n c e r a i s i n g t h e f a c t s of a m a t e r i a l and s u b s t a n t i a l n a t u r e . State Mont of Montana e x r e l . C i t y Motor Co., I n c . v . D i s t . C O U ~ P~. ~ O I T . 486, 32 St.Rep. v. D i s t . C t . , Inc., 34, 36; S t a t e ex r e l . B u r l i n g t o n N o r t h e r n , I n c . 159 Mont. 295, 496 P.2d 1152; DeWinter v. Capp Homes, 162 Ivlont. 1 9 , 507 P.2d 1 0 6 1 . W e f i n d t h a t p l a i n t i f f had r a i s e d no f a c t u a l i s s u e a t the t i m e of t h e motion f o r summary judgment t h a t was e i t h e r m a t e r i a l o r of a s u b s t a n t i a l nature. From e x a m i n a t i o n of t h e r e c o r d , c o n s i s t i n g of t h e p l e a d i n g s , answers t o i n t e r r o g a t o r i e s , and d e p o s i t i o n s , w e c o n c l u d e t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t was c o r r e c t i n d e t e r m i n i n g t h a t d e f e n d a n t had borne i t s burden and shown t h e r e was no m a t e r i a l d i s p u t e of f a c t . B r o g a n ' s d e p o s i t i o n n e g a t e s e a c h of t h e a l l e g a t i o n s o f n e g l i g e n c e on t h e p a r t of d e f e n d a n t Power Company. H i s testimony c l e a r l y e s t a b l i s h e d t h e Power Company had n o t h i n g t o d o w i t h t h e grounding o r t h e w i r i n g of t h e g r a v e l p i t o r of t h e c r u s h e r ; it was done by Brogan o r some of h i s employees. There i s a b s o l u t e l y no e v i d e n c e ia the r e c o r d t h a t d e f e n d a n t , t h r o u g h i t s employees, gave a d v i c e t o Brogan on h i s w i r i n g o r grounding o f t h e c r u s h e r , n o r was t h e r e e v i d e n c e t h a t t h e Power Company n e g l i g e n t l y s u p p l i e d e l e c t r i c i t y w i t h o u t p r o p e r i n s p e c t i o n by government o f f i c i a l s . I f any of t h e equipment, m o t o r s , w i r e s o r grounds were not p r o p e r l y m a i n t a i n e d t h a t was B r o g a n ' s f a u l t . During t h e e n t i r e b u s i n e s s d e a l i n g s Brogan had w i t h d e f e n d a n t Power Company from 1956 t o when he s o l d o u t sometime a f t e r t h e a c c i d e n t , a l l did d e f e n d a n t Company/was s u p p l y him e l e c t r i c i t y t o t h e s e r v i c e p o l e a d j a c e n t t o his p r o p e r t y . Brogan t o o k it fromtiiere and d i d a l l o f h i s own i n s t a l l a t i o n and s e r v i c e work. The a l l e g a t i o n s o f t h e amended c o m p l a i n t s t a n d i n g a l o n e do n o t r a i s e a g e n u i n e i s s u e of m a t e r i a l f a c t p r e c l u d i n g summary judgment. The c a u s e of d e a t h g i v e n by t h e a t t e n d i n g p h y s i c i a n was drowning. The body showed no e v i d e n c e of any e l e c t r i c a l b u r n s . I t was an u n e x p l a i n a b l e i n d u s t r i a l a c c i d e n t c o v e r e d by t h e pro- v i s i o n s of Montana's Workmen's Compensation A c t . The d i s t r i c t c o u r t ' s o r d e r g r a n t i n g summary judgment i s affirmed. i W concur: e Chief J u s t i c e Justices 0

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.