GILBERT v GILBERT
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
No. 12859 I N THE SUPREME COURT O THE STATE OF M N A A F OTN 1974 P M L A. GILBERT, A EA P l a i n t i f f and Respondent, -vs - WILLIAM E. GILBERT, Defendant and A p p e l l a n t . Appeal from: D i s t r i c t Court o f t h e S i x t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , Honorable Nat A l l e n , Judge p r e s i d i n g . Counsel o f Record : For Appellant : B e r g e r , Anderson, S i n c l a i r & Murphy, B i l l i n g s , Montana Arnold A. Berger a r g u e d , B i l l i n g s , Montana Brown and G i l b e r t , Bozeman, Montana Gene I. Brown a r g u e d , Bozeman, Montana F o r Respondent : Huppert and S w i n d l e h u r s t , L i v i n g s t o n , Montana Joseph T. S w i n d l e h u r s t a r g u e d , L i v i n g s t o n , Montana Submitted: Decided: Filed : k B A 8 L$,f!S November 2 1 , 1974 TeB 1 3 1975 Mr. J u s t i c e Gene B. Daly d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of t h e C o u r t . T h i s i s a n a p p e a l by d e f e n d a n t - f a t h e r from a judgment d a t e d August 7 , 1974, of t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t , Park County, denvi n g h i s p e t i t i o n f o r a l e g a l change of c u s t o d y from t h e mother. The p a r t i e s were m a r r i e d a p p r o x i m a t e l y s e v e n and o n e h a l f y e a r s and a t t h e t i m e of t h e d i v o r c e on A p r i l 4 , 1972, t h e r e was one i s s u e of t h e m a r r i a g e a d a u g h t e r Whitney, a g e 3 y e a r s . The p a r t i e s e n t e r e d i n t o a v o l u n t a r y p r o p e r t y s e t t l e m e n t and c u s t o d y agreement and t h i s agreement was f i l e d w i t h t h e c o u r t and made a p a r t of t h e judgment which was g r a n t e d by d e f a u l t t o p l a i n t i f f wife. Custody of t h e minor c h i l d was p l a c e d w i t h t h e mother and p r o v i d e d l i b e r a l v i s i t a t i o n t o t h e f a t h e r ; w i t h two months t e m p o r a r y c u s t o d y t o t h e f a t h e r d u r i n g t h e summer months of J u n e , J u l y and August e a c h y e a r , w i t h t h e same l i b e r a l v i s i t a t i o n p r i v i l e g e s t o t h e mother d u r i n g t h e f a t h e r ' s c u s t o d y . In addition, t h e r e were p r o v i s i o n s f o r c u s t o d y on h o l i d a y s . I n t h e summer 1972, t h e c h i l d r e s i d e d w i t h t h e mother who was a t t e n d i n g summer s c h o o l i n Bozeman. The mother a l l o w e d t h e f a t h e r , who a l s o l i v e d i n Bozeman, f r e q u e n t v i s i t a t i o n . I n t h e f a l l 1972, t h e mother moved t o G a r d i n e r , Montana t o take a teaching position. During t h e f o o t b a l l s e a s o n whenever t h e Bobcats had a home game, t h e mother b r o u g h t t h e c h i l d t o Bozeman and a l l o w e d h e r t o s t a y w i t h t h e f a t h e r f o r t h e weekend. During t h a t s c h o o l y e a r , t h e f a t h e r t r a v e l e d t o G a r d i n e r two o r three t i m e s t o v i s i t the child. I n t h e summer 1973, t h e c h i l d r e s i d e d w i t h t h e f a t h e r f o r a p p r o x i m a t e l y two months a s p r o v i d e d i n t h e d i v o r c e d e c r e e . She t h e n accompanied h e r mother t o Iowa f o r two o r t h r e e weeks t o v i s i t her maternal grandparents. During t h i s t i m e b o t h p a r e n t s had become c o n c e r n e d a b o u t the child. She had become q u i t e s h y around p e o p l e and seemed t o be h a v i n g e m o t i o n a l t r o u b l e s which were n o t improving, b u t r a t h e r seemed t o be g e t t i n g o u t of hand. After consulting with profes- s i o n a l p e o p l e and t h e U n i v e r s i t y School o f f i c i a l s , b o t h p a r e n t s a g r e e d i n September 1973, t h a t t h e c h i l d s h o u l d s t a y w i t h t h e f a t h e r i n Bozeman and a t t e n d t h e c h i l d development c e n t e r spons o r e d by Montana S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y . T h i s program i s b a s i c a l l y a n u r s e r y s c h o o l d e s i g n e d t o t e a c h young c h i l d r e n t o r e l a t e w i t h other children. The c h i l d was e n r o l l e d i n t h e s c h o o l and d i d very well. A t t h e end o f f a l l q u a r t e r , t h e mother wanted t h e c h i l d back b u t allowed h e r t o c o n t i n u e i n t h e s c h o o l a f t e r t a l k i n g t o h e r t e a c h e r who encouraged t h e mother t o keep t h e c h i l d i n t h e school. The mother a g a i n a t t e m p t e d t o g e t t h e c h i l d back a t t h e end o f w i n t e r q u a r t e r , b u t gave up a f t e r b e i n g t h r e a t e n e d w i t h l e g a l a c t i o n by t h e f a t h e r . I n May 1974, t h e f a t h e r p e t i The c o u r t r e - t i o n e d f o r t h e c u s t o d y of h i s d a u g h t e r , Whitney. A t t h e end of t h e s c h o o l f u s e d t o award him c u s t o d y . term, the mother was s e r v e d w i t h a r e s t r a i n i n g o r d e r i s s u e d t o p r e v e n t h e r from g a i n i n g c u s t o d y u n t i l t h e i n s t a n t a p p e a l was completed. The mother r e m a r r i e d on J u n e 1 5 , 1974. H e r husband i s a F a c i l i t i e s P l a n n i n g E n g i n e e r w i t h Mountain B e l l Telephone Company, permanently a s s i g n e d t o Cheyenne, Wyoming. purchased a two bedroom home. $14,500 p e r annum. The c o u p l e h a s The new h u s b a n d ' s e a r n i n g s a r e He h a s t h r e e c h i l d r e n by a p r e v i o u s m a r r i a g e and pays $225 p e r month c h i l d s u p p o r t . On a p p e a l , t h e f a t h e r c h a l l e n g e s t h e c o n s t i t u t i o n a l i t y of s e c t i o n 9 1 - 4 5 1 5 ( 2 ) , R.C.M. 1 9 4 7 , which p r o v i d e s i n e s s e n c e t h a t a c h i l d of t e n d e r y e a r s , e v e r y t h i n g e l s e b e i n g e q u a l between t h e two p a r e n t s , s h o u l d be awarded t o t h e mother. s e c t i o n 21-137, R.C.M. He a l s o a t t a c k s 1947, a s u n c o n s t i t u t i o n a l . That s e c t i o n p r o v i d e s t h e w i f e may b e awarded a t t o r n e y f e e s from t h e husband. There i s no l i k e p r o v i s i o n f o r t h e husband. The f a t h e r c o n t e n d s t h a t b o t h s t a t u t e s d i s c r i m i n a t e on t h e b a s i s of s e x i n v i o l a t i o n of A r t i c l e 11, Sec. 4 , 1 9 7 2 Montana C o n s t i t u t i o n and t h e F i f t h and F o u r t e e n t h Amendments t o t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s C o n s t i t u t i o n . The c o n s t i t u t i o n a l q u e s t i o n s p r e s e n t e d f o r r e v i e w w e r e n o t r a i s e d i n t h e t r i a l c o u r t and were n o t c e r t i f i e d t o t h i s C o u r t a s i s r e q u i r e d by Rule 38, M.R.App.Civ.P., notice t o the attorney general. t h e r e f o r e t h e r e w a s no The a t t o r n e y g e n e r a l must be g i v e n a n o p p o r t u n i t y under Rule 38 t o a p p e a r i n d e f e n s e of l e g i s l a t i v e a c t s which a r e c h a l l e n g e d on c o n s t i t u t i o n a l grounds. The f a t h e r ' s f i n a l i s s u e i s "Did t h e t r i a l judge a b u s e h i s d i s c r e t i o n i n f a i l i n g t o modify t h e d e c r e e of d i v o r c e t o award c u s t o d y o f t h e minor c h i l d of t h e p a r t i e s t o d e f e n d a n t husband?" The f a t h e r a r g u e s t h e r e h a s been a s i g n i f i c a n t change of c i r c u m s t a n c e s s i n c e t h e o r i g i n a l d i v o r c e d e c r e e which w a r r a n t s t h e change o f c u s t o d y of Whitney from t h e mother t o t h e f a t h e r . How- e v e r , t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t i n i t s f i n d i n g s of f a c t No. I X s t a t e d : "That t h e r e h a s been no m a t e r i a l c h a n s e of c i r cumstances w a r r a n t i n g a m o d i f i c a t i o n of t h e d e c r e e . I' d I n i t s conclusion of l a w I , t h e c o u r t s t a t e d : "That no m a t e r i a l change of c i r c u m s t a n c e s e x i s t s t h a t w a r r a n t a m o d i f i c a t i o n of t h e o r i g i n a l d e c r e e , and t h a t it i s f o r t h e b e s t i n t e r e s t s o f t h e minor c h i l d t h a t s h e remain i n t h e c u s t o d y of h e r m o t h e r , s u b j e c t t o t h e v i s i t a t i o n and summer c u s t o d y on t h e p a r t of h e r f a t h e r , a s provided i n t h e o r i g i n a l decree." This Court has c o n s i s t e n t l y held t h a t i n custody c a s e s t h e u n d e r l y i n g p r i n c i p l e , paramount t o a l l o t h e r s , i s t h e w e l f a r e and b e s t i n t e r e s t s of t h e c h i l d and no change i n t h e c h i l d ' s c u s t o d y w i l l be a l l o w e d e x c e p t where a d e q u a t e c a u s e t h e r e f o r a r i s e s o u t of a changed c o n d i t i o n . T h a t changed c i r c u m s t a n c e s o r con- d i t i o n s a r e based on t h e p r i n c i p l e t h a t s t a b i l i t y of home l i f e of c h i l d r e n i s a v i t a l f a c t o r t o t h e i r w e l l b e i n g and t h e t u r m o i l of l i t i g a t i o n must be minimized and somewhere b r o u g h t t o a n end. T h i s Court a l s o recognizes t h e s u p e r i o r p o s i t i o n of t h e t r i a l judge i n s u c h m a t t e r s and w i l l n o t d i s t u r b t h e t r i a l c o u r t ' s f i n d i n g s u n l e s s t h e r e i s a m i s t a k e of l a w o r a f i n d i n g of f a c t n o t s u p p o r t e d by c r e d i b l e e v i d e n c e t h a t would amount t o a c l e a r abuse of d i s c r e t i o n . Bayers v . B a y e r s , 129 Mont. 1, 281 P.2d 5 0 6 ; I n t h e Matter o f t h e Adoption of Dwayne B i e r y , a Minor C h i l d , , Mont - .- 522 P.2d 1377, 1378, 3 1 St.Rep. 458. It i s uncontradicted i n t h e record t h a t a f t e r t h e f i r s t y e a r under t h e o r i g i n a l c u s t o d y agreement t h e c h i l d became emot i o n a l l y ill. The p a r t i e s r e c o g n i z e d t h i s change of c o n d i t i o n and p h y s i c a l c u s t o d y was g i v e n t o t h e f a t h e r a t t h a t t i m e t o s e r v e t h e b e s t i n t e r e s t of t h i s c h i l d . Disregarding t h e s t a t e d inten- t i o n s of t h e p a r t i e s a t t h a t t i m e and o n l y c o n s i d e r i n g t h e n a t u r a l consequences of t h e i r a c t s , w e view t h e s i t u a t i o n s o l e l y from t h e p o i n t of view of t h e b e s t i n t e r e s t s o f t h i s c h i l d . p h y s i c a l c u s t o d y of t h i s c h i l d i n i t s p r e s e n t environment i s a f a c t and h a s been f o r a l o n g p e r i o d o f t i m e , when viewed i n t h e l i g h t of t h e f o r m a t i v e y e a r s o f a f o u r y e a r o l d c h i l d a t t h e t i m e s h e came i n t o t h e p r e s e n t environment a f t e r a n u n s u c c e s s f u l one y e a r from a g e t h r e e t o f o u r y e a r s i n t h e f i r s t a g r e e d c u s t o d y arrangement. T h i s c h i l d w i l l be s i x y e a r s o l d on March 1 6 , 1975. There a r e no a l l e g a t i o n s o f u n f i t n e s s o r t h e l i k e b e f o r e t h i s Court. The change o f c u s t o d y i s a g r e e d t o have been s u c c e s s - f u l i n s o f a r as t h e e m o t i o n a l h e a l t h of t h e c h i l d was c o n c e r n e d . There i s no c o n f l i c t on t h i s p o i n t . There i s t e s t i m o n y i n t h e r e c o r d from seven p e o p l e , o t h e r t h a n t h e p a r t i e s , who a p p e a r t o have been f r i e n d s of b o t h of t h e p a r t i e s and have o b s e r v e d t h e p r e s e n t environment. They a l l a g r e e t o t h e h i g h q u a l i t y of t h e p r e s e n t c u s t o d y environment and t h e h e a l t h y e m o t i o n a l e f f e c t i t h a s had on t h e c h i l d . The r e t u r n o f p h y s i c a l c u s t o d y t o t h e mother i s based p r i m a r i l y on t h e m a t e r n a l d e s i r e and l o v e f o r t h e c h i l d which i s no d o u b t g e n u i n e and s i n c e r e . The mother h a s r e m a r r i e d t o a man who h a s a r e s p o n s i b l e p o s i t i o n o u t o f t h e s t a t e of Montana and i s p a y i n g s u p p o r t f o r h i s own c h i l d r e n by a p r i o r m a r r i a g e . The s t e p - f a t h e r d i d n o t a p p e a r i n c o u r t , s o t h a t any e v a l u a t i o n c o u l d be made by t h e t r i a l c o u r t c o n c e r n i n g t h e u n d e r s t a n d i n g and w i l l i n g n e s s o r q u a l i f i c a t i o n s h e m i g h t have t o assume t h e r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s t h a t would a t t e n d t h e moving o f t h i s c h i l d who h a s formed s t r o n g e m o t i o n a l t i e s w i t h h e r own f a t h e r . A s t h i s Court s a i d i n Biery: "Directing our a t t e n t i o n t o t h e f i r s t i s s u e , w e n o t e t h a t t h i s C o u r t h a s c o n s i s t e n t l y looked t o t h e b e s t i n t e r e s t s of t h e c h i l d i n d e t e r m i n i n g custody. [ C i t i n g c a s e s ] I n awarding t h e c u s t o d y of a minor, s e c t i o n 91-4515(1) s p e c i f i c a l l y p r o v i d e s t h a t t h e c o u r t i s t o be guided: "'By what a p p e a r s t o be f o r t h e b e s t i n t e r e s t s of t h e c h i l d i n r e s p e c t t o i t s t e m p o r a l and i t s m e n t a l and moral w e l f a r e * * * ' "The p a r e n t ' s r i g h t t o t h e c u s t o d y of h e r minor c h i l d i s n o t a n a b s o l u t e o n e , even though it be conceded t h a t s h e i s a f i t and p r o p e r p e r s o n . In a l l such c a s e s t h e c r u c i a l f a c t o r i s t h e c h i l d ' s w e l f a r e , . b o t h m a t e r i a l and p s y c h o l o g i c a l , c o n s i d e r i n g i n p a r t i c u l a r t h e t i e s of a f f e c t i o n t h e c h i l d h a s formed and t h e consequences of b r e a k i n g t h o s e t i e s . * * *" The a g r e e d f a c t s i n t h i s c a s e d e m o n s t r a t e s e v e r a l i n t e r r e l a t e d c h a n g e s of c o n d i t i o n t h a t would w a r r a n t c o n s i d e r a t i o n by t h e c o u r t , inasmuch a s t h e y b e a r d i r e c t l y on t h e w e l f a r e o f t h i s c h i l d , and t h e t r i a l c o u r t ' i s h o l d i n g t h a t none e x i s t w a s e r r o r . I n view of t h e h i s t o r y of t h i s c h i l d and t h e e m o t i o n a l problems t h a t have s o r e c e n t l y j u s t begun t o d i s a p p e a r i n t h e p r e s e n t environment, we f e e l t h a t t o u p r o o t h e r a g a i n and p l a c e h e r i n a s t r a n g e home i n a n o t h e r c i t y , w i t h a s t e p - f a t h e r who i s unknown t o t h e c h i l d o r t o t h e c o u r t , a s i t r e l a t e s t o h i s r o l e a s a f a t h e r , c o u l d have a n e x t r e m e l y d e t r i m e n t a l e f f e c t on t h e child. The r e c o r d b e f o r e t h i s C o u r t w i l l n o t j u s t i f y t h e u p r o o t i n g of t h e c h i l d from t h e s e c u r i t y s h e now f e e l s and p l a c e h e r i n a n environment of which t h i s C o u r t i s u n s u r e . The judgment of t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t i s r e v e r s e d and t h e c a u s e remanded t o t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t t o p l a c e l e g a l c u s t o d y i n t h e f a t h e r and p r o v i d e t h e mother w i t h v i s i t a t i o n r i g h t s e q u i v a l e n t t o t h o s e e n j o y e d by t h e f a t h e r i n t h e o ,. W concur: e Chief J u s t i c e Justices 1 d e c r e e of d i v o r c e . Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
