STATE EX REL MONTANA POWER v DEPT

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

I N THE SUPREME ,2OUKT OF THE STATE OF M N A A OTN 1975 STATb ex r e i . THE :JION'I'AI\IA i30lJER COMPANY, Petitioner, DEPAKTMENT OF PUBLI-C SERVICE REGUTATION, PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, and M N A A OTN CONSUMER COUNSEL, GEOFFREY 12. BRAZIER, Respondents. Counsel o f Record: For P e t i t i o n e r K e n d r i c k Smith a r g u e d , B u t t e , Montana R o b e r t D. C o r e t t e , J o h n J. Burke and Mark ' . C l a r k a p p e a r e d , B u t t e , Montana 4 G e o f f r e y I,. B r a z i e r a r g u e d , H e l e n a , Montana V i l l i a m E. 0 ' ~ e a r y r g u e d , H e l e n a , Montana a uss sell L. Doty Jr. a r g u e d , H e l e n a , Montana ! ' a t r i c k G i l f e a t h e r a p p e a r e d , H e l e n a , Montana S u b m i t t e d : November 14, 1975 Decided : qF5 3 i) 7974 M r . J u s t i c e John Conway Harrison d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion o f t h e Court. This i s a p e t i t i o n f o r a w r i t of review o r o t h e r approp r i a t e w r i t t o r e q u i r e t h e Montana Public S e r v i c e Commission t o g r a n t p e t i t i o n e r ' s motion f o r a temporary approval of a n a t u r a l gas i n c r e a s e . On March 12, 1975, Montana Power Company, h e r e i n a f t e r c a l l e d p e t i t i o n e r , f i l e d w i t h t h e Montana Public S e r v i c e Commission, h e r e i n a f t e r r e f e r r e d t o a s t h e Commission, a p e t i t i o n t o i n c r e a s e r a t e s and charges f o r e l e c t r i c and n a t u r a l gas s e r v i c e s and t o change c e r t a i n r e g u l a t i o n s concerning them. Those m a t t e r s became Docket No. 6348 of t h e Commission. The Commission s e t h e a r i n g on Docket No. 6348 f o r September 8 , 1975, b u t t h i s was c a n c e l l e d and d i d n o t commence u n t i l October 20,1975. A second phase of t h e h e a r i n g s was s e t f o r January 12, 1976. I n t h e meantime, t h e Commission scheduled " s a t e l l i t e h e a r i n g s ' ' nine c i t i e s i n t h e s t a t e . To n o t be r e p e t i t i o u s and t o f u l l y understand t h e f a c t u a l i s s u e s involved h e r e r e f e r e n c e i s made t o t h i s C o u r t ' s opinion dated October 1 7 , 1975, e n t i t l e d Montana Consumer Counsel, Geoffrey L. B r a z i e r v. Public S e r v i c e Commission of Montana e t a l . and The Montana Power Co., Mon t . , 541 P.2d 769, 32 St.Rep. 1026. I n t h a t c a s e t h i s Court approved t h e u s e by t h e Public S e r v i c e Commission o f t h e s o - c a l l e d "automatic adjustment c l a u s e " a s a p p l i e d t o t h e r a p i d l y r i s i n g c o s t s of imported Canadian gas. Pending a d e c i s i o n of t h e Commission Docket 6348, p e t i t i o n e r on September 23, 1975, f i l e d a motion f o r temporary approval of gas r a t e i n c r e a s e s s u b j e c t t o r e b a t e . This motion i n t e r a l i a gave these reasons f o r t h e request: 11 1. The temporary r a t e i n c r e a s e r e q u e s t e d h e r e i n i s r e q u i r e d t o , b u t w i l l n o t completely, o f f s e t t h e i n c r e a s e d c o s t t o t h e Anplicant of o b t a i n i n g a n a t u r a l gas supply t o s e r v e i t s consumers, which c o s t has i n c r e a s e d d r a s t i c a l l y due t o a c t i o n s by t h e National Government of Canada. "2. The cause f o r t h e s e h i g h e r gas c o s t s i s shown i n Appendix ' C ' , a t t a c h e d h e r e t o and i n c o r p o r a t e d h e r e i n , which c o n t a i n s t h e Orders of t h e Canadian Government i n c r e a s i n g t h e b o r d e r p r i c e . (These Orders a r e a l s o contained i n A l i c a n t ' s E x h i b i t s Nos. 3 , 4 , 5 and 6 , 'Export LicensesYPwhich were f i l e d w i t h t h e Commission i n t h i s Docket on June 1 2 , 1975). These documents show t h a t t h e National Government of Canada has ordered t h a t t h e border p r i c e f o r gas exported from Canada s h a l l be i n c r e a s e d from $1.00 t o $1.40 per m i l l i o n BTU e f f e c t i v e August 1, 1975, and t o $1.60 p e r m i l l i o n BTU e f f e c t i v e November 1, 1975. "3, Commencing on August 1, 1975, due t o t h e s e Orders of t h e Canadian Government, t h e A p p l i c a n t ' s average monthly c o s t of purchased gas and r o y a l t y i n c r e a s e d approximately one m i l l i o n two hundred thousand , d o l l a r s ($1,200,000). Commencing on December 1, 1975, t h e r e w i l l be a f u r t h e r monthly i n c r e a s e of approximately s i x hundred thousand d o l l a r s ($600,000), f o r a t o t a l i n c r e a s e of approximately one m i l l i o n e i g h t hundred thousand d o l l a r s ($1,800,000) p e r month. Applicant must i m mediately be allowed t o pass through t h e s e h i g h e r c o s t s f o r t h i s gas a c q u i r e d f o r and s u p p l i e d t o Montana gas consumers o r i t w i l l be unable t o c o n t i n u e making t h e s e necessary expenditures. "4. O J u l y 24, 1975, t h e F e d e r a l Power Commission n i s s u e d an Order i n i t s Docket No. CP74-187, a copy of which i s a t t a c h e d a s Appendix I D ' and i n c o r p o r a t e d h e r e i n . The F e d e r a l Power Commission i n t h a t Order a u t h o r i z e d t h e Applicant t o import n a t u r a l gas from Canada a t t h e i n c r e a s e d border p r i c e s of $1.40 p e r m i l l i o n BTU, e f f e c t i v e August 1, 1975, and $1.60 p e r m i l l i o n BTU, e f f e c t i v e November 1, 1975. an E b i t No. 1 5 , Revised of ched h as "5. t i lAtpypEl~i candtr' sinn'c)oxarhpicopye d hwhich , i s a t t a7/18/75 e r e t o U i etu , a s Appendix ' orat e r e i n shows t h a t under 1 p r e s e n t r a t e s t h e Applicant would s u s t a i n a l o s s d u r i n g t h e t e s t y e a r 1975 of $13,031,968 due t o t h e maximum impact of i n c r e a s e d purchased gas c o s t and r o y a l t y expenses. I1 This motion of September 23 was n o t i c d f o r h e a r i n g October 2, 1975 and was argued on t h a t d a t e . postponed a d e c i s i o n u n t i l October 30. The Commission on October 20 O October 31, 1975, t h e n Commission i s s u e d i t s o r d e r g r a n t i n g only a p o r t i o n , 6 / l l t h s , of t h e amount requested. The o r d e r g r a n t e d p e t i t i o n e r $ 6 , 5 1 0 , 7 9 1 a s a temporary i n c r e a s e and denied t h e remainder, which i n e f f e c t p e t i t i o n e r a l l e g e s p r e c l u d e s i t from r e c o v e r i n g over 5 m i l l i o n d o l l a r s of i n c r e a s e d c o s t s a n n u a l l y , P e t i t i o n e r a l l e g e s t h e d e n i a l o f i t s r e q u e s t by t h e Commission i s : I Ia . Contrary t o law i n t h a t i t g r a n t s a flow- through (on a temporary approval b a s i s ) of only a p a r t of t h e i n c r e a s e d c o s t s of purchased gas and r o y a l t y expenses a s s e t f o r t h i n t h e Motion of September 23, 1975, E x h i b i t ' A ' ; Contrary t o law i n t h a t i t precludes "b. recovery by a flow-through, and on a temporary approval b a s i s , of a l l of t h e i n c r e a s e d c o s t of purchased gas and r o y a l t y expenses a s s e t f o r t h i n t h e s a i d Motion of September 23, 1975, Exhibit ' A ' ; 1 1c . Contrary t o law i n t h a t i t d e f i e s t h e l e t t e r and t h e s p i r i t of t h e 1974 Rate Order (Order #4147, d a t e d August 30, 1974) and t h e d e c i s i o n of t h i s Court d a t e d October 17, 1975, i n Case No. 12944, e n t i t l e d B r a z i e r v. PSC and Montana Power, a s I n t e r v e n o r ; Contrary "d. has any d i s c r e t i o n c r e t i o n o f t h e PSC t h e f u l l temporary t o law i n t h a t i f t h e PSC i n t h e m a t t e r , then t h e d i s has been abused by n o t g r a n t i n g increase; Contrary t o law i n t h a t t h i s Order, "e. r e g a r d l e s s of o t h e r consequences, would be an i l l e g a l and advance r e d u c t i o n of allowable expenses i n t h e main r a t e c a s e ; Contrary t o law i n t h a t t h i s Order "f. would d e p r i v e P e t i t i o n e r of i t s p r o p e r t y w i t h o u t due process of law. I t P e t i t i o n e r f u r t h e r a l l e g e s t h a t u n l e s s t h e motion i s g r a n t e d i n i t s e n t i r e t y i t s f i n a n c i a l c o n d i t i o n w i l l be s e r i o u s l y jeopardized and i t s a b i l i t y t o s e c u r e Canadian gas w i l l be endangered. I n a s k i n g f o r e x t r a o r d i n a r y r e l i e f from t h i s Court, p e t i t i o n e r n o t e s t h a t a review of t h e Commission's d e c i s i o n on t h e m e r i t s of Docket 6348 w i l l t a k e u n t i l t h e s p r i n g of 1976 o r l a t e r i f a p p e a l s a r e involved, and t h i s i s t o o l a t e t o provide t h e immediate and n e c e s s a r y r e l i e f asked f o r . Further, t h a t i n f a i l i n g t o grant the p e t i t i o n e r ' s motion t h e omm mission's o r d e r i s pure c o n f i s c a t i o n , f o r once p e t i t i o n e r i s n o t allowed to c o l l e c t during t h e i n t e r v e n i n g p e r i o d , i t can never c o l l e c t f o r t h a t p e r i o d and i t would s u f f e r a d i s a s t r o u s revenue impairment and l o s s of f i n a n c i a l a b i l i t y . O November 7, 1975, t h i s Court i s s u e d an a l t e r n a t i v e w r i t n t o show cause and s e t t h e h e a r i n g f o r November 14, 1975. Motions t o quash and d i s m i s s , answers and memorandums of a u t h o r i t y were f i l e d by a l l c o u n s e l and t h e m a t t e r was a r g u e d November 14, 1975. Follow- i n g argument t h i s Court o r d e r e d t h e Commission t o f i l e w i t h t h e Court a copy o f i t s m a t h e m a t i c a l c o m p u t a t i o n s of amounts approved and d i s a p p r o v e d f o r i t s o r d e r of October 31, 1975. The i s s u e i s w h e t h e r t h e Commission o r d e r f i l e d October 31, 1975, i s c o n t r a r y t o t h e s t a t u t o r y l a w and i t s i n t e r p r e t a t i o n by t h i s C o u r t , and t o t a l l y d i s r e g a r d s e x i s t i n g c o n t r a c t u a l commitments o f p e t i t i o n e r , and i s t h e r e f o r e a r b i t r a r y , u n r e a s o n a b l e and a d e n i a l of p e t i t i o n e r ' s r i g h t o f due p r o c e s s . Respondent Montana Consumer Counsel a p p e a r e d i n o p p o s i t i o n t o b o t h p e t i t i o n e r and t h e Commission, a r g u i n g t h a t s e c t i o n 70-113, R.C.M. 1947, a s amended by C h a p t e r 115 o f t h e Laws o f 1975, i s u n c o n s t i t u t i o n a l i n t h a t i t a u t h o r i z e s a temporary i n c r e a s e pending a n e a r i n g ; t h a t t h e s u p p o r t i n g d a t a o f p e t i t i o n e r and s u b s e q u e n t c o u r t o r d e r i s m i s l e a d i n g , n o t founded on f a c t and p r o v i d e s a n i n c o m p l e t e p i c t u r e o f p e t i t i o n e r ' s s t a t i s t i c s ; and f u r t h e r whether t h e f a i l u r e t o g r a n t a l l of t h e temporary r e q u e s t i s c o n t r a r y t o iaw o r c o n s t i t u t e s an a b u s e o f d i s c r e t i o n . W f i n d no m e r i t t o e r e s p o n d e n t Montana Consumer C o u n s e l ' s c o n t e n t i o n s . W e note that t h e s e arguments i n s u b s t a n c e were made t o t h i s Court i n t h e c a s e of Nontana Consumew Counsel v. P u b l i c S e r v i c e Commission and The Montana Power Company, s u p r a , and d e c i d e d c o n t r a r y t o r e s p o n d e n t ' s position. See: P r i v a t e Tele-Commun., ( I l l . 1 9 7 5 ) , 335 N.E.2d 110. I n c . v. I l l i n o i s B e l l T e l . Co., W e f u r t h e r n o t e t h a t i n a l l "pass t h r o u g h i n c r e a s e s f ' t h i s Court h a s been c a r e f u l t o p r o t e c t t h e i n t e r e s t s o f t h e consumers by a l l o w i n g e a c h i n c r e a s e s u b j e c t t o r e b a t e i f i t can b e shown t h a t p e t i t i o n e r i s o b t a i n i n g more t h a n i t is authorized. W now l o o k t o t h e Commission's f i n d i n g s o f f a c t , c o n c l u s i o n e oE law and o r d e r t o d e t e r m i n e whether t h e y d i s r e g a r d c o n t r a c t u a l o b l i g a t i o n s of p e t i t i o n e r and a r e t h e r e f o r e a r b i - t r a r y , u n r e a s o n a b l e and deny p e t i t i o n e r ' s r i g h t s . "FINDINGS O FACT F The Applicant i s a n a t u r a l gas p u b l i c u t i l i t y "3. s e r v i n g customers w i t h i n t h e S t a t e of Montana. A p p l i c a n t ' s r a t e s f o r n a t u r a l gas s e r v i c e a r e s u b j e c t t o t h e j u r i s d i c t i o n of t h i s Commission. "4. Commencing on August 1, 1975, by o r d e r s of t h e Canadian Government, t h e border p r i c e f o r gas exported from Canada was i n c r e a s e d from $1.00 t o $1.40 p e r m i l l i o n BTU' s. "5. Commencing on November 1, 1975, by o r d e r s of t h e Canadian Government, t h e border p r i c e f o r gas exported from Canada s h a l l b e i n c r e a s e d from $1.40 t o $1.60 p e r m i l l i o n BTIJ' s . "6. Applicant contends t h a t t h e t h e p r e s e n t r a t e s A p p l i c a n t ' s p r o p e r t y would b e s u b j e c t t o c o n f i s c a t i o n w i t h o u t due process of law. "7. A p p l i c a n t ' s Appendix E t o t h e motion shows t h a t under t h e p r e s e n t r a t e s , Applicant would s u s t a i n a l o s s d u r i n g t h e t e s t y e a r 1975 of $13,031,968 due t o t h e maximum impact of i n c r e a s e d purchased gas c o s t and r o y a l t y expense. "8. A p p l i c a n t ' s Appendix B t o t h e motion shows t h e u n i t p r i c e of Canadian purchased gas a t $1.4241 p e r M F and C t h e u n i t p r i c e of Canadian r o y a l t y gas a t $.5553 p e r M F C f o r t h e month of August, 1975. "9. The temporary r a t e r e l i e f i n c r e a s e r e q u e s t e d by Applicant f o r i t s r e s i d e n t i a l , n o n - r e s i d e n t i a l and o t h e r u t i l i t y customers was $11,646,283. "CONCLUSION O LAW F "1. The Commission has a duty t o i n s u r e t h a t u t i l i t i e s under i t s j u r i s d i c t i o n provide reasonably adequate s e r v i c e a t j u s t and r e a s o n a b l e r a t e s t h a t a r e n o t c o n f i s c a t o r y of t h e u t i l i t i e s ' p r o p e r t y . Montana (RCM 1947, 70-105) The Commission may t e m p o r a r i l y approve an i n c r e a s e "2. pending a h e a r i n g and f i n a l d e c i s i o n , w i t h t h e a d d i t i o n a l revenues c o l l e c t e d s u b j e c t t o r e b a t e . ( C 1947, 70-113). RM I n view of t h e l a r g e i n c r e a s e s i n t h e p r i c e of Canadian "3. purchased gas and Canadian r o y a l t y g a s , i n c r e a s e d r a t e s f o r A p p l i c a n t ' s n a t u r a l gas d i s t r i b u t i o n s e r v i c e a r e justified. "4. The temporary i n c r e a s e approved h e r e i n i s a j u s t and r e a s o n a b l e amount t o i n s u r e continued s e r v i c e t o A p p l i c a n t ' s consumers. "5. The r a t e r e l i e f r e q u e s t e d by Applicant should be granted i n p a r t . "1. Montana Power Company s h a l l f i l e monthly r e p o r t s i n d i c a t i n g i t s s o u r c e s and volumes of purchased gas and r o y a l t y gas. "2. Applicant s h a l l be g r a n t e d a temporary i n c r e a s e f o r t h e amount of $6,510,791 f o r i t s r e s i d e n t i a l , nonr e s i d e n t i a l and o t h e r u t i l i t y customers. Applicant s h a l l f i l e w i t h i n t e n (10) days of t h i s o r d e r , a t a r i f f r e f l e c t i n g t h i s allowance. "3. This temporary i n c r e a s e s h a l l b e spread e q u a l l y t o A p p l i c a n t ' s r e s i d e n t i a l , n o n - r e s i d e n t i a l and o t h e r u t i l i t y customers. Said i n c r e a s e s h a l l be e f f e c t i v e f o r s e r v i c e s rendered on and a f t e r November 1, 1975. "4. This i s a temporary o r d e r . I n t h i s r e g a r d t h e Commission, a s a m a t t e r of p o l i c y , w i l l c o n s i d e r temporary r e q u e s t s only i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h f u l l r a t e c a s e h e a r i n g s such a s t h a t i n p r o g r e s s i n Docket No. 6348. It The Commission's i n t e n t i o n i n g r a n t i n g c e r t a i n temporary i n c r e a s e s h e r e i n i s p r i m a r i l y t o a l l o w time f o r t h e thorough c o n s i d e r a t i o n of t h e e n t i r e o p e r a t i o n s of t h e Company w i t h o u t chancing j e o p a r d i z i n g t h o s e operat i o n s , due t o t h e Canadian gas and r o y a l t y gas i n c r e a s e s on e x p o r t gas. "5. The a d d i t i o n a l revenues r e s u l t i n g from t h i s i n t e r i m order w i l l be subject t o rebate plus i n t e r e s t a t t h e r a t e of r e t u r n g r a n t e d t h e Company i n t h e f i n a l o r d e r , i f t h e Commission determines a t t h e end of t h e g e n e r a l r a t e c a s e t h a t lower r a t e s should become e f f e c t i v e . "6. This temporary o r d e r s h a l l b e e f f e c t i v e only u n t i l t h e i n i t i a l f i n a l o r d e r i s made, i n Docket No. 6348A and s h a l l n o t b e i n e f f e c t d u r i n g any a p p e a l therefrom. W n o t e t h a t conclusion of law No. 3 admits t h e l a r g e i n &e c r e a s e s i n Canadian purchased gas and Canadian r o y a l t y g a s and such ,- i n c r e a s e d r a t e s a r e j u s t i f i e d , y e t no f i n d i n g o r j u s t i f i c a t i o n was made on t h e g r a n t i n g of t h e p a r t i a l amount. For t h i s r e a s o n t h i s Court r e q u e s t e d and obtained t h e Commission's mathematical computations. Accompanying t h e s e , computations was a l e t t e r t o t h e Court from t h e chairman of t h e Commission, w h i c h ' s t a t e d : i n p e r t i n e n t p a r t : "The response i n c l u d e s : a ) Simple c a l c u l a t i o n s i n d i c a t i n g how t h e $5,135,492 and $6,510,791 f i g u r e s were derived. b) Revised E x h i b i t 2(from t h e one f i l e d w i t h you on Friday) w i t h a g r e a t e r e x p l a n a t i o n of t h e sources and methodology used i n a r r i v i n g a t t h o s e figures. c ) ellow ow' worksheet i n d i c a t i n g t h a t i f 96.8% of t h e gas from Aden were Royalty g a s , t h e Montana Power Company could c u t i t s Canadian gas p r i c e by $5,135,492 (or t h e amount of temporary i n c r e a s e n o t allowed by t h i s Commission). T h i s 'yellow' works h e e t does n o t i n c l u d e p r i c e r e d u c t i o n s which could a c c r u e from e i t h e r t h e e l i m i n a t i o n of i n c r e a s e d Montana purchased gas c o s t s o r from t h e t a x e f f e c t , I I Using t h i s l e t t e r and t a k i n g s p e c i f i c a l l y paragraph ( c ) i t becomes obvious t h e Commission made a managerial d e c i s i o n a s t o t h e "take o r payu c o n t r a c t s of p e t i t i o n e r f o r Canadian imported g a s from t h e Aden f i e l d and i n s o doing made an a r b i t r a r y d e c i s i o n beyond t h e scope of i t s powers. P e t i t i o n e r i n i t s E x h i b i t "D" submitted t o t h e Commission noted: "A ' t a k e o r pay' o b l i g a t i o n r e q u i r e s payment f o r a c e r t a i n volume of g a s whether o r n o t d e l i v e r y o f t h a t volune i s a c t u a l l y taken. By way of e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h e l i s t , t h e a n n o t a t i o n I none' means t h a t t h e c o n t r a c t v provision. Five o f t h e 28 c o n t a i n s no ' t a k e o r ; k ' o r pay' p r o v i s i o n . The c o n t r a c t s c o n t a i n no :e a n n o t a t i o n 1 85%' means t h e c o n t r a c t c o n t a i n s a p r o v i s i o n which e s t a b l i s h e d a ' t a k e o r pay' o b l i g a t i o n a t 85% of t h e l e v e l taken i n t h e same month i n t h e preceding y e a r when t h e cutback o f t h e Aden a u t h o r i z a t i o n occurred. The a n n o t a t i o n I 100 % ' means t h e c o n t r a c t c o n t a i n s a ' t a k e o r pay' o b l i g a t i o n which was u n a f f e c t e d by t h e cutback a t Aden. "The summary s h e e t shows t h a t a t o t a l of 5,844 lI1MCF p e r y e a r i s c u r r e n t l y being purchased and imported a t Aden. Of t h i s amount, 825 MMCF a r e n o t s u b j e c t t o an e x p r e s s , c o n t r a c t u a l t a k e o r pay o b l i g a t i o n . However, o p e r a t i n g o b l i g a t i o n s preclude t h e s h u t t i n g - i n o f t h e w e l l s which produce gas under t h e s e f i v e c o n t r a c t s . I f t h e w e l l s i n q u e s t i o n were s h u t - i n , t h e pools from which they were producing would be d r a i n e d by production by o t h e r s , i n c l u d i n g t h e ~ p p l i c a n t ' ss u b s i d i a r y , Canadian Montana Gas Company. I I Accepting t h e information c o n t a i n e d i n p e t i t i o n e r ' s E x h i b i t "D", f o r t h e r e i s no evidence b e f o r e u s t o c o n t r a d i c t i t , and even d i s r e g a r d i n g t h e f i v e "no take" c o n t r a c t s , t h e r e i s no way t h e Commission could have a r r i v e d a t i t s f i g u r e s except t o f o r c e t h e p e t i t i o n e r t o break i t s Canadian I' t a k e o r pay" c o n t r a c t s , and i f p e t i t i o n e r broke such c o n t r a c t s , i t would be l i a b l e f o r t h e c o n t r a c t e d g a s , i t s e a r n i n g s would b e diminished, and i t s consumers deprived of an a l r e a d y diminishing g a s supply. powers of t h e Commission. Such a c t i o n i s beyond t h e This Court i n Cascade County Consumers Assn. v. Pub. Ser.Commtn, 144 Mont. 169, 186, 394 P.2d 856, had t h i s t o s a y r e g a r d i n g t h e powers of t h e r e g u l a t o r y a g e n c i e s : h his Court has o f t e n spoken o u t a g a i n s t t h e abuse o f power by s t a t e boards. I n t h e c a s e of S t a t e ex r e l . S t a t e Board of E q u a l i z a t i o n v. Kovich, 142 1JIont. 201, 383 P.2d 818, we r e c e n t l y s a i d : ' T h i s c o u r t has uniformly h e l d t h a t t h e S t a t e ~ o a r d ' s actions, i f a r b i t r a r y , fraudulent, o r contrary t o law, a r e void and w i l l be s o d e c l a r e d by t h e c o u r t s . I. I 1 This Court i s n o t unaware of t h e g r e a t r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s placed on t h e Public S e r v i c e Commission t o r e g u l a t e p e t i t i o n e r i n such a manner a s t o provide an adequate g a s supply f o r p e t i t i o n e r ' s consumers a t a r e a s o n a b l e c o s t and a t t h e same time provide an adequate r e t u r n t o p e t i t i o n e r a s provided by law. During a period of extreme i n f l a t i o n t h i s t a s k a t times seems impossible, however, t h e Commission i n i t s a c t i o n s cannot go beyond i t s s t a t u t o r y or c o n s t i t u t i o n a l powers. W f i n d t h e Commission i n c o n s i d e r i n g t h e f a c t s when making e i t s determination and o r d e r - 1) disallowed "pass through1' c o s t s t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t they may become c o n f i s c a t o r y , i n v i o l a t i o n of t h e c o n s t i t u t i o n a l p r o h i b i t i o n a g a i n s t t a k i n g p r o p e r t y w i t h o u t due process of law, and 2) t h a t t h i s c o n s t i t u t e s a r b i t r a r y a c t i o n and u n j u s t l y d e n i e s p e t i t i o n e r t h e "pass through" c o s t s . T h e r e f o r e , we o r d e r t h a t t h e Commission o r d e r of October 31, 1975, #4220, be s e t a s i d e and t h a t p e t i t i o n e r ' s motion f o r a temporary approval of a gas i n c r e a s e t o correspond w i t h t h e i n c r e a s e d c o s t of Canadian gas and s u b j e c t t o t h e f i n a l d e c i s i o n of t h e Commission t o r e b a t e , be g r a n t e d . W Concur: e / Justices.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.