STATE v KOLSTAD
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
No. 12822 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE O M N A A F OTN 1975 THE STATE OF MONTANA, P l a i n t i f f and Respondent, -VS - MARLIN KOLSTAD, Defendant and A p p e l l a n t . Appeal from: D i s t r i c t Court of t h e T h i r t e e n t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , Honorable R o b e r t Wilson, J u d g e p r e s i d i n g . Counsel o f Record: For Appellant : John L. Adams, Jr. a r g u e d , B i l l i n g s , Montana F o r Respondent: Hon. R o b e r t L. Woodahl, A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l , Helena, Montana Thomas A. Budewitz, A s s i s t a n t A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l , a r g u e d , Helena, Montana Harold F. Hanser, County A t t o r n e y , B i l l i n g s , Montana C h a r l e s A. B r a d l e y , Deputy County A t t o r n e y , a p p e a r e d , B i l l i n g s , Montana Submitted: Decided : 1Filed : t? 1 'j r3/5 J a n u a r y 1 7 , 1975 FEB 11 1995 . Mr. J u s t i c e Wesley C a s t l e s d e l i v e r e d t h e O p i n i o n o f t h e C o u r t . T h i s i s a n a p p e a l by d e f e n d a n t M a r l i n K o l s t a d f r o m a judgment of t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t , Y e l l o w s t o n e County, r e n d e r e d upon a j u r y v e r d i c t , c o n v i c t i n g him o f b u r g l a r y i n t h e f i r s t degree. On August 1 9 , 1 9 7 3 , a t a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 2 : 3 0 a.m., officers o f t h e B i l l i n g s P o l i c e Department r e s p o n d e d t o a n a l a r m a t t h e C a r l Wiseman and S o n s , I n c . warehouse. Upon a r r i v i n g a t t h e w a r e h o u s e , t h e y f o u n d a 1 1 d o o r s s e c u r e e x c e p t f o r t h e d o o r on the east side. They e n t e r e d t h e b u i l d i n g by t h i s d o o r a n d found t h e building dark inside. I n s i d e t h e door t h e y found a b o l t c u t t e r and a severed padlock. evidence. These two i t e m s were e n t e r e d i n t o The l i g h t s were t u r n e d on a n d a s y s t e m a t i c s e a r c h o f t h e b u i l d i n g was c o n d u c t e d . The s e a r c h r e v e a l e d R o b e r t J o h n s o n and defendant l y i n g beneath a t r u c k parked i n t h e warehouse. T h e r e was beer i n t h e hand o f e a c h o f t h e p a r t i e s . Neither of t h e s e men were employees o f Wiseman and S o n s , n o r d i d t h e y e n t e r t h e warehouse w i t h p e r m i s s i o n o f a n y employee. Testimony a t t r i a l i n d i c a t e d o n l y J o h n s o n and d e f e n d a n t were a t t h e s c e n e when t h e o f f i c e r s a r r i v e d and t h e r e was no e v i d e n c e o f o t h e r s b e i n g present e i t h e r before o r a f t e r t h e occurrence. A l t h o u g h d e f e n d a n t d i d n o t t e s t i f y , h i s v e r s i o n o f what o c c u r r e d was s e t f o r t h i n S t a t e ' s E x h i b i t No. 1 2 , a n u n s i g n e d s t a t e m e n t , t h e c o n t e n t s o f which w e r e r e a d t o t h e j u r y by a p o l i c e o f f i c e r f o r t h e c i t y o f ~ i l l i n g s . The s t a t e m e n t i n d i c a t e d t h a t Bob J o h n s o n , h i s w i f e , Sandy Wirtman, a n d d e f e n d a n t w e r e i n J o h n s o n ' s home when t h e y h e a r d a n o i s e a n d n o t i c e d t h e wind- s n i e l d o f J o h n s o n ' s c a r had been b r o k e n . They s t a r t e d i n p u r s u i t 01 t h e supposed v a n d a l s when t h e y saw them r u n i n t o t h e w a r e h o u s e . 'l'he d o o r b e i n g o p e n , J o h n s o n and d e f e n d a n t p u r s u e d them i n t o t h e warehouse. A s t h e y were a b o u t t o l e a v e , t h e y s a w p o l i c e c a r s o u t s i d e and h i d t o p r e v e n t d i s c o v e r y of t h e i r p r e s e n c e premises. the N f u r t h e r t e s t i m o n y o r e v i d e n c e was p r e s e n t e d t o o subst a n t i a t e t h i s e x p l a n a t i o n . I n h i s opening s t a t e m e n t t o t h e j u r y , t h e p r o s e c u t o r made t h e f o l l o w i n g comment which i s a l l e g e d by d e f e n d a n t t o be prejudicial, reversible error: "You w i l l h e a r t h i s o f f i c e r , a l o n g w i t h o t h e r s , t e s t i f y t o t h i s , t h a t inside t h e building they found t h e l o c k from t h e b u i l d i n g , c u t , l y i n g on t h e f l o o r , and t h e r e w i l l be a p h o t o g r a p h of i t . Near t h e l o c k was a s e t of b o l t c u t t e r s and t h e b o l t c u t t e r s had t h e l e t t e r s S. M. on them. You w i l l h e a r one o f t h e o f f i c e r s t e s t i f y t h a t i n t h e p i c k u p t r u c k , which was r e g i s t e r e d t o t h e o t h e r man under t h e t r u c k , i n s i d e t h e b u i l d i n g , was a s e t o f p i p e c u t t e r s w i t h t h e same i n i t i a l s , S.M." During t h e c o u r s e of t h e t r i a l , t h e p r o s e c u t o r made a n o f f e r of proof t o t h e e f f e c t t h a t t h e B i l l i n g s p o l i c e o f f i c e r on t h e s t a n d would t e s t i f y t h a t he looked i n t o a p i c k u p t r u c k parked a p p r o x i m a t e l y 2 Q Q y a r d s from t h e warehouse and t h a t he o b s e r v e d i n p l a i n view a s e t of p i p e c u t t e r s , stamped w i t h t h e i n i t i a l s S.M. The o f f e r of proof f u r t h e r s t a t e d t h a t o t h e r w i t n e s s e s would t e s t i f y t h a t t h i s i s t h e same manner i n which t o o l s b e l o n g i n g t o Swain & M o r r i s a r e marked and t h a t t h i s p i c k u p was r e g i s t e r e d t o M r . Johnson. The d i s t r i c t c o u r t e x c l u d e d any e v i d e n c e t h a t t h i s was t h e manner i n which Swain & M o r r i s stamp t h e i r t o o l s b u t , w i t h t h e p r o p e r f o u n d a t i o n a s t o t h e ownership of t h e p i c k u p , would a l l o w t h e p i p e c u t t e r s t o be a d m i t t e d i n e v i d e n c e and t o be examined by t h e j u r y . The S t a t e f a i l e d t o e s t a b l i s h t h i s f o u n d a t i o n and, a s a r e s u l t , t h e e v i d e n c e was not presented t o t h e jury. T h i s a p p e a l p r e s e n t s a s i n g l e i s s u e , namely, whether f a i l u r e of t h e S t a t e t o p r e s e n t e v i d e n c e r e f e r r e d t o i n i t s opening statement c o n s t i t u t e s r e v e r s i b l e , p r e j u d i c i a l e r r o r w a r r a n t i n g a new t r i a l ? W e h o l d t h a t it d o e s n o t . T h i s C o u r t on two p r e v i o u s o c c a s i o n s d i s c u s s e d t h i s very i s s u e : S t a t e v . Zachrneier, 1 5 1 Mont. 256, 263, 4 4 1 P.2d 7 3 7 , 741; S t a t e v . Ruona, 159 Mont. 507, 513, 499 P.2d 7 9 7 , 800. I n Zachmeier, a p r o s e c u t i o n f o r m u r d e r , t h e c o u n t y a t t o r n e y , i n h i s o p e n i n g s t a t e m e n t , made a d e t a i l e d r e c i t a t i o n o f a n a d m i s s i o n o f g u i l t made by t h e d e f e n d a n t , which i n c l u d e d : " ' I t h e n g r a b b e d a s i l k s t o c k i n g and t i e d it around h e r t h r o a t . I w a s n ' t s u r e s h e was d e a d and I kept listening f o r a heart beat. I could n o t be s u r e s h e was d e a d s o I went i n t o t h e k i t c h e n and g o t a b u t c h e r k n i f e a n d pushed it i n t o h e r h e a r t . I l i s t e n e d f o r a h e a r t b e a t and f e l t h e r p u l s e . I was s u r e s h e was d e a d s o I l e f t t h e h o u s e g o t i n t o my c a r and went t o t h e Lobby Lounge * * *. ' " The a d m i s s i o n , however, was found t o be c o n s t i t u t i o n a l l y d e f e c tlve. T h i s Court recognized t h e h i g h l y p r e j u d i c i a l n a t u r e of t h i s t y p e o f s t a t e m e n t and remanded f o r a new t r i a l . I n Ruona, a p r o s e c u t i o n f o r c r i m i n a l p o s s e s s i o n o f d a n g e r o u s d r u g s , t h e p r o s e c u t i o n made r e f e r e n c e i n i t s o p e n i n g s t a t e rnent t o t h e j u r y t o t h e e f f e c t t h a t d r u g s had been found a t 805 S. 27th S t r e e t . Throughout t h e t r i a l , t h e S t a t e made r e p e a t e d a t t e m p t s t o i n t r o d u c e e v i d e n c e c o n c e r n i n g t h e h o u s e , which was c h a r a c t e r i z e d a s a "hippy pad". T h i s C o u r t found t h e r e was a f a i l u r e o f p r o o f by t h e S t a t e of a r e l a t i o n s h i p between d e f e n d a n t and t h e named p r e m i s e s . The C o u r t a f f i r m e d t h e c o n v i c t i o n s t a t i n g t h e t e s t was: " ' I s t h e r e a reasonable p o s s i b i l i t y t h a t t h e ina d m i s s i b l e evidence might have c c n t r i b u t e d t o t h e conviction? ' " I n t h e i n s t a n t appeal, defendant f a i l e d t o object t o t h e s e opening remarks. The d i s t r i c t c o u r t s p e c i f i c a l l y i n s t r u c - t e d t h e j u r y , p r i o r t o o p e n i n g s t a t e m e n t s , t h a t i t was t o d i s r e g a r d any s t a t e m e n t s o f c o u n s e l n o t s u p p o r t e d by t h e e v i d e n c e and it was o n l y t o c o n s i d e r t h e t e s t i m o n y o f t h e w i t n e s s e s upon the w i t n e s s s t a n d a n d s u c h e x h i b i t s a s were a d m i t t e d i n e v i - dence. The j u r y was reminded of t h i s i n s t r u c t i o n a t t h e c l o s e of t h e t r i a l , and t h e w r i t t e n i n s t r u c t i o n went t o t h e j u r y room. Except f o r t h e one s e n t e n c e i n t h e opening s t a t e m e n t , no f u r t h e r comment r e g a r d i n g t h e p i p e c u t t e r s was made w i t h i n t h e hearing of t h e jury. The opening remarks o f t h i s c a s e do n o t compare t o t h e g r a v i t y o f t h e remarks i n Zachmeier. Therefore, we hold t h i s r e f e r e n c e i n t h e opening s t a t e m e n t was n o t o f such a n a t u r e as t o c o n t r i b u t e t o d e f e n d a n t ' s c o n v i c t i o n . The judgment o f t h e t r i a l c o u r t i s a f f i r m e d . W e concur: "p' . *" .t ",*; , lr Chief J u s t i c e t ---- ---- i---ff2* . ,> . --,,L --~;-LY%L. .,rnA
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
