IN THE INTEREST OF L.A.M.M. Minor GREENE COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICE, Respondent vs. C.M.M., Appellant
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE INTEREST OF L.A.M.M., ) ) MINOR, ) ) GREENE COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICE, ) ) Respondent, ) ) vs. ) ) C.M.M., ) ) Appellant. ) No. SD37486 Filed: June 7, 2022 APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY Honorable Calvin R. Holden, Judge REVERSED AND REMANDED C.M.M. ("Mother") appeals from the judgment terminating her parental rights entered February 15, 2022. Although a transcript was filed with the Court on June 2, 2022, a significant portion thereof was missing. A certified transcriptionist with the Office of State Courts Administrator stated that the sound recording equipment malfunctioned for a period of nearly 90 minutes during trial. Both parties assert that a reversal and remand is required under such circumstances, and we agree. "Because it is unclear what evidence the trial court had before it, this [C]ourt may not speculate on the evidentiary basis for the trial court's decision." Johnson v. Director of Revenue, 237 S.W.3d 291, 291 (Mo. App. S.D. 2007). Moreover, "[a]n appealing party is entitled to a full and complete transcript for the appellate court's review." Mandacina v. Pompey, 634 S.W.3d 631, 645 (Mo. App. W.D. 2021) (quoting State v. Middleton, 995 S.W.2d 443, 466 (Mo. banc 1999)). "Where a party is free from fault or negligence, has exercised due diligence in seeking to prepare the record on appeal, and his right of appeal is prejudiced because a transcript of the proceedings in the trial court cannot be prepared, a new trial should be granted." Jackson v. Director of Revenue, 60 S.W.3d 707, 708 (Mo. App. S.D. 2001) (quoting Dykes v. McNeill, 735 S.W.2d 213, 213-14 (Mo. App. S.D. 1987)); see also, In re A.J.M., 158 S.W.3d 866, 867 (Mo. App. S.D. 2005). "The appropriate remedy when 'the record on appeal is inadequate through no fault of the parties' is to reverse and remand the case to the trial court." Goodman v. Goodman, 165 S.W.3d 499, 501-02 (Mo. App. E.D. 2005) (quoting Oyler v. Director of Revenue, 10 S.W.3d 226, 228 (Mo. App. W.D. 2000)). Conclusion The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial on the record. MARY W. SHEFFIELD, C.J. – OPINION AUTHOR DON E. BURRELL, J. – CONCURS JENNIFER R. GROWCOCK, J. – CONCURS 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
