Duncan v. State
Annotate this Case241 S.W.3d 441 (2007)
Lucille F. DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 67621.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
December 26, 2007.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Irene C. Karns, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Before HOWARD, C.J., and SPINDEN and HOLLIGER, JJ.
OrderPER CURIAM.
Lucille Duncan appeals the denial of her Rule 29.15 Motion for ineffective assistance of counsel. Duncan argues that because her trial attorney failed to call two witnesses, she did not receive adequate representation. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Duncan's trial attorney acted as a reasonably competent lawyer in deciding not to call either witness.
Rule 84.16(b).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
