Bell v. State

240 S.W.3d 738 (2007)

Robert BELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED 88933.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

November 20, 2007.

Timothy Forneris, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Robert Bell, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on five of his claims. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).