Sherwood Brown v. State of Mississippi
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 2003-DR-01325-SCT
SHERWOOD BROWN
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
TRIAL JUDGE:
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY:
NATURE OF THE CASE:
DISPOSITION:
04/07/1995
HON. ANDREW C. BAKER
DESOTO COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
ELIZABETH JANE HICKS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: MARVIN L. WHITE, JR.
ROBERT L. WILLIAMS
CRIMINAL - DEATH PENALTY - POST
CONVICTION
LEAVE TO SEEK POST-CONVICTION
RELIEF GRANTED - 06/17/2004
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:
EN BANC
DICKINSON, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:
¶1.
Sherwood Brown was convicted of two counts of murder and one count of capital murder for the
1993 murders of Evangela Boyd, Verline Boyd and Betty Boyd. See Brown v. State, 690 So.2d 276
(Miss. 1996). His conviction was upheld by this Court on direct appeal.1 See id. Brown's subsequent
1
Brown's petition for writ of certiorari before the United States Supreme Court was denied
(Brown v. Mississippi, 522 U.S. 849, 118 S. Ct. 136, 139 L. Ed. 2d. 85 (1997)) as was his motion
for rehearing on the matter (Brown v. Mississippi, 522 U.S. 1009, 118 S. Ct. 591, 139 L.Ed. 2d.
427 (1997)). According to his petition before this Court, Brown's petition for habeas corpus relief was
filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi and at the time of his
filing before this Court, was still pending. See Brown v. Puckett, No.3:OiCV197-D, 2003 WL
21018627 (N.D. Miss. 2003).
post-conviction relief request was denied. See Brown v. State, 798 So.2d 481 (Miss. 2001). Brown
now files a successive application for leave to seek post-conviction relief.
DISCUSSION
¶2.
Brown’s single claim in his application is that he is mentally retarded and, therefore, exempt from
execution based on Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S. Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed. 2d 335 (2002).
Since Atkins was not decided until 2002, it constitutes an “intervening decision” of the United States
Supreme Court, saving Brown's petition before this Court from being procedurally barred. Miss. Code
Ann. § 99-39-5 (2). See also Foster v. State, 848 So.2d 172 (Miss. 2003).
¶3.
Our recent opinion in Chase v. State, 2004 WL 1118688 (Miss. 2004), controls the analysis of
the case sub judice and dictates that Brown be allowed to file his petition. On a post-conviction request
for an Atkins determination, where the trial took place prior to the Atkins decision, the movant must
present to this Court an affidavit from an expert who opines to a reasonable degree of probability/certainty
that the defendant has an IQ of 75 or below and that, in the expert's opinion, there is a reasonable basis
to believe that the defendant will be found mentally retarded.
¶4.
Brown has provided an affidavit from Dr. Marsha Little, who testifies that upon recollection that
Brown has an IQ in the lower 70's. In addition, she testifies that Brown was mentally retarded at the time
of the crime and further testing would support her conclusion.
¶5.
Therefore, based on Atkins and our recent decision in Chase, we grant Brown leave to file a
motion to vacate death sentence in the DeSoto County Circuit Court.
¶6.
LEAVE TO SEEK POST-CONVICTION RELIEF, GRANTED.
SMITH, C.J., WALLER AND COBB, P.JJ., CARLSON, GRAVES AND
RANDOLPH, JJ., CONCUR. EASLEY, J., DISSENTS WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN
OPINION. DIAZ, J., NOT PARTICIPATING.
2
3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
