The Mississippi Bar v. Derryl Wayne Peden
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 2001-BD-01133-SCT
THE MISSISSIPPI BAR
v.
DERRYL WAYNE PEDEN
ORDER OF DISBARMENT
¶1. This matter is before the Court sitting en banc upon a joint formal complaint for disbarment filed by the
Mississippi Bar, through its General Counsel, and Derryl Wayne Peden, seeking the disbarment of Peden
for his unprofessional and unethical conduct and conduct evincing unfitness for the practice of law. This
Court finds that the joint formal complaint is well taken and should be granted.
¶2. Derryl Wayne Peden was a resident of Hinds County, Mississippi, whose last known mailing address
was 2501 River Oaks Building, Apartment C, Jackson, Mississippi 39211. Peden is currently incarcerated
in the Hinds County Detention Center in Raymond, Mississippi. At all times hereinafter mentioned, Peden
was a member of the Mississippi Bar subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of
Mississippi and its disciplinary agencies. The formal complaint in the instant cause was filed pursuant to
Rules 6 and 10 of the Rules of Discipline for the Mississippi Bar.
¶3. On or about May 16, 2000, Johnette R. Wolfe filed an informal complaint with the Mississippi Bar
accusing Peden of professional misconduct. This complaint accused Peden of forgery, neglect, lack of
communication and other misconduct. Peden does not intend to respond to this complaint and enters a plea
of nolo contendere to the complaint filed by Wolfe.
¶4. On or about July 30, 1999, Peden issued a check drawn from his Attorney at Law Trust Account at the
Union Planters Bank, check number 574, made payable to Kenneth Simmons for the amount of $16,
666.66 which was not honored by the bank due to insufficient funds. Since that time Peden has paid
Simmons $6,000.00 of the debt but still owes approximately $10,666.66. Simmons is owed this money due
to his hiring of Peden as his attorney to represent him. The case eventually settled for $25,000.00, of which
Simmons was to receive 66 2/3% (or $16,666.66). While Peden does not admit to misappropriating or
converting the $16,666.66 owed to Simmons, he enters a plea of nolo contendere to this allegation.
¶5. On or about May 9, 2000, Peden was arrested by the Jackson, Mississippi Police Department and
charged with committing armed robberies of a Check Cash Headquarters on March 28, 2000, and of an
Advance America on April 28, 2000. On May 25, 2001, Peden entered pleas of guilty to two counts of
armed robbery in violation of Miss. Code Ann. § 97-3-79 (2000) in Cause Numbers 00-0-720-LBH and
00-0-721-LBH in the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi. Peden was
sentenced to serve a term of six years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections.
¶6. On or about June 21, 2000, Peden was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges involving federal
securities and wire fraud violations. Peden was also charged with failing to file tax returns for the years of
1994, 1995, and 1996. On or about February 22, 2001, in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Mississippi, Hattiesburg Division, in Case Number 2:00cr23PG-001, Peden entered a
guilty plea to conspiracy to commit wire fraud or securities fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and willful
failure to file an income tax return for the year 1995 in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203. Thereafter Peden
was committed to the custody fo the United States Bureau of Prisons to serve a term of sixty (60) months
for the conspiracy charge and twelve (12) months for the failure to file an income tax return, consecutively.
The sentence received in the United States District Court is to run concurrently with the sentence imposed
by the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi.
¶7. This Court agrees that the joint formal complaint for disbarment filed by the Mississippi Bar and Derryl
Wayne Peden is sufficient for the purposes of Rule 10.2 of the Mississippi Rules of Discipline(1) since such
a filing is synonymous with a plea of nolo contendere. This Court also agrees that Peden's convictions and
sentences regarding the armed robberies, conspiracy to commit wire fraud or securities fraud and failure to
file an income tax return for the year 1995 are among the type of crimes contemplated by Rule 6(a) of the
Mississippi Rules of Discipline(2) which warrant the imposition of immediate suspension from the practice of
law in the State of Mississippi.
¶8. This Court finds that Peden has engaged in unprofessional and unethical conduct and conduct evincing
unfitness for the practice of law and that his acts constitute cause for discipline to be imposed.
¶9. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:
¶10. 1. This Court accepts Derryl Wayne Peden joining in the instant joint formal complaint for disbarment
as a joint petitioner as being tantamount to a motion to enter a nolo contendere plea.
¶11. 2. Derryl Wayne Peden should be, and is hereby, DISBARRED.
¶12. 3. This order shall constitute notice of disbarment in this cause.
¶13. 4. The Clerk of the Supreme Court of Mississippi shall immediately forward an attested copy of this
order to the Circuit Court Judges and Chancellors in and for Hinds County, Mississippi, and the Senior
Judges of such courts shall enter this order upon the minutes of their respective courts.
¶14. 5. The Clerk of the Supreme Court of Mississippi shall immediately forward an attested copy of this
order to the Clerks of the United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of
Mississippi, to the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and to the Clerk of the
Supreme Court of the United States.
¶15. 6. Costs of the formal complaint should be and are hereby assessed against Derryl Wayne Peden.
¶16. SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, this the 24th day of October, 2001.
FOR THE COURT:
/s/ Edwin Lloyd Pittman
EDWIN LLOYD PITTMAN
CHIEF JUSTICE
WALLER, J., NOT PARTICIPATING.
1. Rule 10.2 states:
Pleas of Nolo Contendere--Contents. Such pleas need not address the factual matters alleged on the
Formal Complaint. If accepted, a plea of nolo contendere shall be considered tantamount to proof of
guilt on the matters charged for purposes of determining the discipline to be imposed or the
disposition to be made.
2. Rule 6(a) states:
Whenever any attorney subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of the Court shall be convicted in any
court of any state or in any federal court, or enter a plea of guilty or a plea of nolo contendere therein,
or tender a guilty plea pursuant to the provisions of Miss.Code Ann. § 99-15-26 (Supp.1993), or
any similar provision in state or federal law therein of any felony (other than manslaughter) or of any
misdemeanor involving fraud, dishonesty, misrepresentation, deceit, or willful failure to account for
money or property of a client, a certified copy of the judgment of conviction or order accepting or
acknowledging the offer or tender of a guilty plea pursuant to the provisions of Miss.Code Ann. § 9915-26 (Supp.1993), or any similar provision in state or federal law shall be presented to the Court by
Complaint Counsel and shall be conclusive evidence thereof. The Court shall then forthwith strike the
name of the attorney and order his immediate suspension from the practice of law.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
