Henry Jackson a/k/a June Bug v. State of Mississippi

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CP-00325-COA HENRY JACKSON A/K/A JUNE BUG APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: TRIAL JUDGE: COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: NATURE OF THE CASE: DISPOSITION: MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: APPELLEE 03/15/2022 HON. JAMES McCLURE III TATE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT HENRY JACKSON (PRO SE) OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: ASHLEY L. SULSER CIVIL - POST-CONVICTION RELIEF AFFIRMED - 04/18/2023 BEFORE WILSON, P.J., McDONALD AND LAWRENCE, JJ. WILSON, P.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶1. In 1993, Henry Jackson was convicted of selling cocaine and sentenced to serve forty years as a nonviolent habitual offender and subsequent drug offender. This Court affirmed his conviction and sentence. Jackson v. State, 662 So. 2d 209 (Miss. Ct. App. 1995). ¶2. In 2022, Jackson filed a motion for post-conviction relief (PCR) in the trial court, alleging that the trial court illegally sentenced him as a habitual offender because the State did not prove his actual “served time” on his prior convictions.1 The trial court dismissed the 1 We note in passing that Jackson’s claim is without merit. “The requirement that the defendant must have actually served separate terms of one year or more is a requirement of [the violent habitual offender statute] only; the issue is irrelevant under [the nonviolent habitual offender statute].” Berryman v. State, 337 So. 3d 1116, 1135 (¶70) (Miss. Ct. App. 2021), cert. denied, 338 So. 3d 127 (Miss. 2022), cert. denied, 143 S. Ct. 581 (2023). As motion because the Mississippi Supreme Court had not granted Jackson permission to file the motion. See Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-7 (Rev. 2020). Jackson appealed, but his appellate brief fails to address the basis of the trial court’s order dismissing the case. ¶3. The trial court properly dismissed Jackson’s PCR motion for lack of jurisdiction. Section 99-39-7 provides that a PCR motion “shall be filed as an original civil action in the trial court, except in cases in which the petitioner’s conviction and sentence have been appealed to the Supreme Court of Mississippi and there affirmed or the appeal dismissed.” Id. (emphasis added). In cases in which a prisoner’s conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal, the prisoner must obtain permission from the Mississippi Supreme Court before filing a PCR motion in the trial court. Id. “This procedure is not merely advisory, but jurisdictional.” Dunaway v. State, 111 So. 3d 117, 118 (¶6) (Miss. Ct. App. 2013) (quoting Campbell v. State, 75 So. 3d 1160, 1162 (¶7) (Miss. Ct. App. 2011)). Because Jackson failed to obtain permission from the Supreme Court, the trial court properly dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction. Id. at 119 (¶8). ¶4. AFFIRMED. BARNES, C.J., CARLTON, P.J., GREENLEE, WESTBROOKS, McDONALD, LAWRENCE, McCARTY, SMITH AND EMFINGER, JJ., CONCUR. noted above, Jackson was sentenced as a nonviolent habitual offender. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.