Bennie Stroud, Jr. v. State of Mississippi

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2001-CP-00820-COA BENNIE STROUD, JR. APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT: TRIAL JUDGE: COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: DISTRICT ATTORNEY: NATURE OF THE CASE: TRIAL COURT DISPOSITION: DISPOSITION: MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: CERTIORARI FILED: MANDATE ISSUED: APPELLEE 10/30/1997 HON. BILL JONES JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT BENNIE STROUD, JR. (PRO SE) OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: DEIRDRE MCCRORY ROBERT KEITH MILLER CIVIL - POST CONVICTION RELIEF DENIED RELIEF DISMISSED - 03/11/2003 BEFORE SOUTHWICK, P.J., LEE AND MYERS, JJ. SOUTHWICK, P.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶1. Bennie Stroud filed for post-conviction relief following the entry of his guilty plea to charges of aggravated assault, possession of a firearm by a felon and possession of a controlled substance. The Circuit Court of Jackson County denied the petition and Stroud appeals. Finding we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal. FACTS ¶2. Bennie Stroud entered a plea of guilty to multiple felony offenses on March 5, 1997. The following day, he filed a pro se motion to withdraw the guilty plea. The motion was heard on April 14, 1997, and denied. At the same proceeding, Stroud was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment as an habitual offender on April 14, 1997. ¶3. Stroud filed his petition for post-conviction relief on October 8, 1997, claiming his guilty plea was involuntary and that counsel had been ineffective. The circuit court denied the petition on October 30, 1997. An appeal was filed with the supreme court on January 20, 1998. Since that time, occasional motions have been submitted, but Stroud’s initial brief was not filed until July 2002. DISCUSSION ¶4. Appeals from both civil and criminal decisions must be filed within thirty days after the date of entry of the judgment or order from which the petition appeals. M.R.A.P. 4(a). Stroud filed his appeal well after this deadline had passed. Under our court rules, pro se parties are held to the same standards of procedure as attorneys. URCCC 8.05(3). ¶5. Had Stroud alleged and proved that he failed to receive timely notice of the entry of the order denying his post-conviction relief petition, he could have sought to reopen the time for appeal. M.R.A.P. 4(h). However, Stroud has never made that claim and has never petitioned any court to reopen the time for appeal. ¶6. Having failed to follow either route to appeal the denial of his petition, Stroud is time-barred. This Court has no jurisdiction to review his claims and his petition is hereby dismissed. ¶7. THE APPEAL OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT DENYING POST-CONVICTION RELIEF IS DISMISSED. COSTS OF THIS APPEAL ARE ASSESSED TO JACKSON COUNTY. 2 McMILLIN, C.J., KING, P.J., BRIDGES, THOMAS, LEE, IRVING, MYERS, CHANDLER AND GRIFFIS, JJ., CONCUR. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.