Robert Lee DeLoach v. State of Mississippi
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 2001-KA-01490-COA
ROBERT LEE DELOACH
APPELLANT
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
DATE OF TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT:
TRIAL JUDGE:
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY:
NATURE OF THE CASE:
TRIAL COURT DISPOSITION:
DISPOSITION:
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
CERTIORARI FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:
APPELLEE
5/20/1997
HON. LEE J. HOWARD
LOWNDES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
CARRIE A. JOURDAN
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: DEIRDRE MCCRORY
FORREST ALLGOOD
CRIMINAL - FELONY
GUILTY OF ARMED ROBBERY, SENTENCED
TO 22 YEARS IN THE CUSTODY OF THE
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS
APPEAL DISMISSED - 3/18/2003
BEFORE SOUTHWICK, P.J., LEE AND MYERS, JJ.
MYERS, J., FOR THE COURT:
¶1.
DeLoach was convicted of armed robbery on May 20, 1997. DeLoach filed an affidavit of
poverty stating a desire to appeal. Other steps, including the estimation of costs of appeal and transcript
costs were also completed. For reasons not apparent in the record, DeLoach never perfected an appeal.
It was not until 2001 that any activity proceeded on behalf of DeLoach to actually seek an appeal.
¶2.
The rule is that a notice of appeal is to be filed within thirty days of judgment or from the denial of
certain post-trial motions. M.R.A.P. 4(a) (d) & (e). There is also a right for a party to seek a thirty-day
extension to file a notice of appeal, provided the request is "filed not later than thirty days after the
expiration of the time otherwise prescribed by this rule." M.R.A.P. 4(g). The appellate rules were amended
in 1997 to establish an explicit time deadline for granting out-of-time appeals.1 A trial court may reopen
the time for appeal if "a party entitled to receive notice of entry of a judgment or order did not receive such
notice . . .within twenty one days of its entry" and if "no party would be prejudiced . . . ." M.R.A.P. 4(h).
A request to reopen is to be filed with the trial court "within 180 days of entry of the judgment or order or
within seven days of receipt of such notice [of the entry of judgment], whichever is earlier . . . ." Id.
(emphasis supplied).
¶3.
The comment to the rule provides that a late appeal may be granted "only upon a motion filed within
180 days of the entry of judgment or within seven days of receipt of notice of such entry, whichever is
earlier." M.R.A.P. 4(h) cmt. We conclude that these deadlines form boundaries for the judicial discretion
that can be exercised. The trial judge did not have the authority to grant an out-of-time appeal at this point
in time.
¶4.
Additionally there is another bar to jurisdiction. Two orders, one appointing an attorney for an
appeal and the other a separate order granting thirty days from date of signing to file an out-of-time appeal
were signed by the trial judge on July 19, 2001, and filed the next day. The notice of appeal was not filed
until August 24, 2001. This was the day after the supreme court dismissed a writ of mandamus requesting
the supreme court to direct the circuit court to rule on the motion for out-of-time appeal. It was dismissed
as being moot because the order had already been granted. We do not understand how the attorney knew
1
Prior to the rules amendments, an indefinite right by the court to suspend the rules existed.
2
she was appointed yet did not know the out-of-time appeal had been granted since the two orders were
signed on the same day and filed on the same day. Even if the trial judge had authority to grant an out-oftime appeal, the deadline for perfecting the appeal had passed when the notice of appeal was filed.
¶5.
THIS APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS BEING UNTIMELY FILED.
ASSESSED TO LOWNDES COUNTY.
COSTS ARE
McMILLIN, C.J., KING AND SOUTHWICK, P.JJ., BRIDGES, THOMAS, LEE,
IRVING, CHANDLER AND GRIFFIS, JJ., CONCUR.
3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
