Larry Collins v. State of Mississippi
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 2002-KA-00459-COA
LARRY COLLINS
APPELLANT
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
DATE OF TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT:
TRIAL JUDGE:
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY:
NATURE OF THE CASE:
TRIAL COURT DISPOSITION:
DISPOSITION:
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
CERTIORARI FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:
APPELLEE
2/21/2002
HON. JOHN M. MONTGOMERY
LOWNDES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
CARRIE A. JOURDAN
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: JEFFREY A. KLINGFUSS
FORREST ALLGOOD
CRIMINAL - FELONY
RAPE AND ARMED ROBBERY HABITUAL
OFFENDER - SENTENCED TO SERVE A TERM
OF LIFE IN THE MDOC FOR EACH COUNT,
EACH TERM TO BE SERVED
CONSECUTIVELY, SUCH SENTENCE SHALL
NOT BE REDUCED NOR SUSPENDED NOR
SHALL SAID DEFENDANT BE ELIGIBLE FOR
PAROLE OR PROBATION.
AFFIRMED - 10/28/2003
BEFORE MCMILLIN, C.J., MYERS AND GRIFFIS, JJ.
MCMILLIN, C.J., FOR THE COURT:
¶1.
Larry Collins was convicted of the crimes of rape and armed robbery arising out of an incident that
occurred at Lake Lowndes campground in Lowndes County. On appeal, Collins asserts two issues for
consideration. First, he contends that the State’s evidence implicating him in the crimes was insufficient as
a matter of law to sustain the verdicts of guilty returned by the jury. Alternatively, he contends that the
guilty verdicts were against the weight of the evidence to the degree that he should be granted a new trial.
¶2.
We find both issues to be procedurally barred from consideration on appeal and, for that reason,
affirm the verdicts of guilty and the resulting judgment of sentence.
¶3.
At the conclusion of the State’s proof, Collins moved for a directed verdict of acquittal on the basis
that the prosecution had failed as a matter of law to present evidence of all of the essential elements of the
crimes for which he was being tried. The trial court denied the motion and the defense proceeded to call
one witness for the defense. At the conclusion of that witness’s testimony, the defense rested. Collins’s
motion for a directed verdict of acquittal was not renewed.
¶4.
It is a long-established rule in Mississippi that if a defendant tests the sufficiency of the State’s
evidence by way of a motion for directed verdict of acquittal after the prosecution has rested and that
motion is unsuccessful, the defendant is deemed to have waived a claim of error based on that denial if he
proceeds to put on evidence in defense and then fails to renew the motion at the close of all the evidence.
Turner v. State, 721 So. 2d 642, 647 (¶16) (Miss. 1998). Collins’s failure to renew his motion or to
present the issue to the trial court in a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict acts as a procedural
bar to our consideration of this issue on appeal.
¶5.
Essentially the same considerations hold true in regard to Collins’s alternate contention that the
verdict was against the weight of the evidence, entitling him to a new trial. An appellate court’s purpose
is to deal with errors committed by the trial court in the course of conducting a trial. Collins v. State, 173
Miss. 179, 159 So. 865 (1935). An appellate court does not, as a general rule subject to some limited
exceptions, consider allegations of improprieties in the conduct of the trial that were not properly raised
2
with the trial court at the appropriate juncture. A claim that the verdict was against the weight of the
evidence must be first presented to the trial court since that court is best positioned to make an informed
decision as to such issue, having had the benefit of hearing the evidence first-hand. McClain v. State, 625
So. 2d 774, 781 (Miss. 1993). An appellate court’s role as to such a contention is limited to deciding
whether the trial court, in denying a new trial motion, has abused the discretion afforded to that court in
making such a determination. Id. If the trial court is not permitted that opportunity through the timely filing
of a post-verdict motion for new trial, there is no opportunity for the trial court to commit the error that must
necessarily precede the intervention of the appellate court. Collier v. State, 811 So. 2d 377, 378-79 (¶5)
(Miss. Ct. App. 2001).
¶6.
Because there was no motion for new trial filed in this cause, there is no error by the trial court
regarding its evaluation of the evidence for this Court to review under the applicable abuse of discretion
standard. Collins’s second contention is procedurally barred.
¶7.
THE JUDGMENT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY OF
CONVICTION ON COUNT I OF RAPE AND SENTENCE OF LIFE AND ON COUNT II OF
ARMED ROBBERY AND SENTENCE OF LIFE IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MISSISSIPPI
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WITH SENTENCES TO RUN CONSECUTIVELY AND
SHALL NOT BE REDUCED OR SUSPENDED AND DEFENDANT SHALL NOT BE
ELIGIBLE FOR PAROLE OR PROBATION, IS AFFIRMED. ALL COSTS OF THIS APPEAL
ARE ASSESSED TO LOWNDES COUNTY.
KING AND SOUTHWICK, P.JJ., BRIDGES, THOMAS, LEE, IRVING, MYERS,
CHANDLER AND GRIFFIS, JJ., CONCUR.
3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
