Calvin Lee Walker v. State of Mississippi
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 2000-KA-01306-COA
CALVIN LEE WALKER
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
DATE OF TRIAL COURT
JUDGMENT:
TRIAL JUDGE:
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY:
NATURE OF THE CASE:
TRIAL COURT DISPOSITION:
APPELLANT
APPELLEE
03/16/2000
HON. KOSTA N. VLAHOS
HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
MELVIN G. COOPER
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: DEIRDRE MCCRORY
CONO A. CARANNA II
CRIMINAL - FELONY
TWO COUNTS OF ARMED ROBBERY: SENTENCED TO
CONCURRENT LIFE SENTENCES AS A HABITUAL TO
BE SERVED DAY FOR DAY WITHOUT HOPE OF
PAROLE OR PROBATION IN THE CUSTODY OF THE
MDOC.
AFFIRMED - 10/16/2001
DISPOSITION:
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
CERTIORARI FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:
11/6/2001
BEFORE SOUTHWICK, P.J., IRVING, AND MYERS, JJ.
MYERS, J., FOR THE COURT:
¶1. This case comes from the Circuit Court of Harrison County, Mississippi, Honorable Kosta N. Vlahos
presiding. Calvin Lee Walker was tried and convicted of two counts of armed robbery. Walker was
sentenced to two concurrent life sentences without parole in the custody of the Mississippi Department of
Corrections. Calvin Walker appeals the guilty verdict raising the following two issues before the Court:
1. WHETHER THE VERDICT IS AGAINST THE SUFFICIENCY AND WEIGHT OF
THE EVIDENCE; AND
2. WHETHER THE VERDICT WAS BASED ON EVIDENCE WHICH IS NOT
CREDIBLE.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
¶2. On May 15, 1998, Angela R. Catlano and Gloria Murphy were robbed by two individuals in the
parking lot of the El Maguey Restaurant in Gulfport, Mississippi. During the robbery Catlano was robbed at
gunpoint by Walker, while Gary Dewayne Walker, nephew of the appellant, robbed Murphy. In the
process of fleeing the scene, Walker was observed by Murphy, who was resisting her assailant. Gary
Walker was apprehended while fleeing the scene of the crime.
¶3. After being arrested Gary Walker was interviewed and informed the police that Calvin Walker was the
other individual involved in the armed robbery. Catlano was unable to identify Calvin Walker in a
subsequent photographic lineup. In another photographic lineup, Murphy stated it was her belief that the
third subject in the photographic lineup, which was Calvin Walker, was the other individual involved in the
armed robbery. At trial Murphy identified Calvin Walker as one of the individuals who robbed her and
Catlano. Gary Walker also testified at Calvin Walker's trial and stated that Calvin Walker robbed one of
the ladies. Based on this evidence, the jury found Calvin Walker guilty of two counts of armed robbery, one
for the robbery of Catlano and one for the robbery of Murphy. Calvin Walker was subsequently found to
be an habitual felon and sentenced to two concurrent life sentences. Calvin Walker then petitioned the trial
court for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict which the trial judge denied. From the denial of that motion,
Calvin Walker brings this appeal.
DISCUSSION OF THE LAW
STANDARD OF REVIEW
¶4. The standard of review for denials of a JNOV which challenges the sufficiency and weight of the
evidence supporting the verdict is abuse of discretion by the trial court and all evidence favorable to the
State is accepted as true. Tran v. State, 785 So. 2d 1112, 1116 (¶8) (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). With
respect to each element of the offense, the standard of review regarding the legal sufficiency of the evidence
is to consider all of the evidence in the light most favorable to the guilty verdict. Wetz v. State, 503 So. 2d
803, 808 (Miss. 1987). "The prosecution must be given the benefit of all favorable inferences that may be
reasonably drawn from the evidence." Id. Matters concerning what weight and credibility to give to the
evidence presented are to be decided by the jury. McClain v. State, 625 So. 2d 774, 778 (Miss. 1993).
ANALYSIS
1. WHETHER THE VERDICT IS AGAINST THE SUFFICIENCY AND WEIGHT OF
THE EVIDENCE; AND
2. WHETHER THE VERDICT WAS BASED ON EVIDENCE WHICH IS NOT
CREDIBLE.
¶5. These two issues are combined as they both have the same standard of review and are governed by the
same facts. Calvin Walker first argues that the in-court identification by Murphy was insufficient to enable
the jury to find Calvin Walker guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. "The inconsistencies of the in-court
identification go only to the credibility and weight of the evidence, which is a factual determination to be
made by the jury." Kimbrough v. State, 379 So. 2d 934, 936 (Miss. 1980). Murphy testified that Calvin
Walker was one of the two men who robbed her and Catlano. Calvin Walker's attorney questioned
Murphy at length on cross-examination concerning her identification of Calvin Walker as the second
robber. Who the jury decides to believe is a decision to be made by the jury, not for this Court. Billiot v.
State, 454 So. 2d 445, 463 (Miss. 1984). In this instance the jury decided that Murphy's in-court
identification of Calvin Walker was credible.
¶6. Calvin Walker's second and final argument is that the testimony of Gary Walker was not credible. Gary
Walker admitted that he committed the robberies and pled guilty the day before Calvin Walker's trial. Gary
Walker testified that Calvin Walker was the other robber. Calvin Walker's attorney used inconsistent
statements made by Gary Walker to the police in an attempt to impeach his credibility on crossexamination. The jury is the sole adjudicator of the credibility of the witnesses presented at trial. Id. The
jury may in whole or in part, believe or disbelieve, accept or reject the testimony of any witness.
Groseclose v. State, 440 So. 2d 297, 300 (Miss. 1983). This is the very nature of the judicial process. In
this case the jury chose to believe Gary Walker's testimony.
CONCLUSION
¶7. Upon considering Calvin Walker's arguments and giving the benefit of all favorable inferences to the
State as dictated by law, this Court finds that the evidence presented at trial was more than sufficient to
support Calvin Walker's conviction. See Wetz, 503 So. 2d at 808. The record before this Court presents
sufficient and believable evidence to support Calvin Walker's conviction by the jury. This Court will reverse
only when the evidence is such that "reasonable and fair-minded jurors could only find the accused not
guilty." McClain, 625 So. 2d at 778. This is clearly not the case here. Based on the evidence presented at
trial, the jury by accepting the testimony of Murphy and Gary Walker could find Calvin Walker guilty of
both counts of armed robbery.
¶8. THE JUDGMENT OF THE HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT OF CONVICTION
OF TWO COUNTS OF ARMED ROBBERY AND SENTENCE OF LIFE FOR EACH COUNT
TO RUN CONCURRENTLY IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS WITHOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF PAROLE OR PROBATION IS
AFFIRMED. COSTS OF THIS APPEAL ARE ASSESSED TO THE APPELLANT.
McMILLIN, C.J., KING AND SOUTHWICK, P.JJ., BRIDGES, THOMAS, LEE,
IRVING, CHANDLER AND BRANTLEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
