List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED May 27, 2015.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW Filed – May 27, 2015 (Petitioner indicated in Italic Type) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. State of Minnesota vs. Deandre Dynell Burges – A14-0168 – Denied Robert Edward Dornbusch vs. Commissioner of Public Safety – A14-1236 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Jay Dean Uldrych – A13-1792 – Denied State of Minnesota vs. Colin Michael Haven –A14-0917 – Denied Lawrence D. Crosno vs. Tom Roy, et al. – A15-0417 – Denied Steven Charles Lind vs. William Guenther – A14-1434 – Denied John Stephen Woodward vs. State of Minnesota – A14-0614 – Denied In the Matter of the Application of Fischer Sand and Aggregate, LLP – A14-0735 Denied Scott Alan Wenker by Jeffrey Wenker, Trustee vs. Xcel Energy, Inc., et al., City of Cottage Grove, et al., Defendants – A14-0047 – Denied Mark R. Zweber vs. Credit River Township, et al. – A14-0893 – Granted Timothy D. Kehr, et al. vs. Harold B. Kail, as trustee for the Bonnie L. Kail Irrevocable Trust, and as trustee for the Carroll A. Britton Family Trust, et al. A15-0327 – Denied State of Minnesota vs. Albert Leroy Goranson – A14-0540 – Denied State of Minnesota vs. Jyron Mendale Young – A14-0885 – Denied James Spencer, Jr. vs. State of Minnesota – A14-1309 – Denied State of Minnesota vs. Armando Jesus Pedraza – A14-0539 – Denied State of Minnesota vs. John Achuil Deng – A14-0847 – Denied Oscar Adrian Orozco vs. State of Minnesota – A13-0427 – Stay Vacated/Denied Maurece LaVarne Graham vs. State of Minnesota – A13-1470 Stay Vacated/Denied Michael Carlton Lowe, Sr. vs. State of Minnesota – A13-1882 Stay Vacated/Denied Willie James Richardson vs. State of Minnesota – A13-2411 Stay Vacated/Denied Tony Dejuan Jackson vs. State of Minnesota – A14-0311 – Stay Vacated/Denied Tony Dejuan Jackson vs. State of Minnesota – A14-0498 – Stay Vacated/Denied Tony Dejuan Jackson vs. State of Minnesota – A14-0900 – Stay Vacated/Denied
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
