State v. Coles
Annotate this CasePursuant to a plea agreement, Defendant pleaded guilty to second-degree criminal sexual conduct and first-degree aggravated robbery in exchange for the State dismissing several charges. Defendant agreed to receive a sentence that was an upward durational departure. The district court sentenced Defendant according to the terms of the plea agreement. Defendant later filed a requested relief under Minn. R. Crim. P. 27.03(9), arguing that the court had impermissibly sentenced him. The district court denied relief. The court of appeals affirmed, concluding that Defendant could not challenge his sentence in a motion to correct his sentence. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) because Defendant’s challenge to his sentence implicated more than simply his sentence, it is properly viewed as a petition for postconviction relief under Minn. Stat. 590.01, not as a motion to correct a sentence under Rule 27.03; and (2) Defendant’s request is time-barred by section 590.01(4)(a).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.