In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Herbert Azubuike Igbanugo, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 191139.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MINNESOTA September 15, 2015 IN SUPREME COURT OmcEOF Ari'B.IAJECcuns A13-2350 In rePetition for Disciplinary Action against Herbert Azubuike Igbanugo, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 191139. ORDER In an opinion filed on May 20, 2015, we suspended respondent Herbert Azubuike Igbanugo from the practice of law for a minimum of 90 days, effective 14 days from the date of the filing of the order. Respondent has filed an affidavit seeking reinstatement in which he states that he has fully complied with the terms of the suspension order, except for successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility does not oppose the request. Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondent Herbert Azubuike Igbanugo is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota, subject to his successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination, and is placed on disciplinary probation for 2 years subject to the following terms and conditions: (a) Respondent shall cooperate fully with the Director' s Office in its efforts to monitor compliance with his probation and promptly respond to the Director's correspondence by the due date. Respondent shall provide 1 the Director with a current mailing address and shall immediately notifY the Director of any change of address. Respondent shall cooperate with the Director's investigation of any allegations of unprofessional conduct that may come to the Director's attention. Upon the Director's request, respondent shall provide authorization for release of information and documentation to verity compliance with the terms of this probation; (b) Respondent shall abide by the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct. 2. By May 20, 2016, respondent shall comply with Rule 18(e)(3 ), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), by filing with the Clerk of Appellate Courts and serving upon the Director proof of respondent's successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Failure to do so shall result in automatic re-suspension pending proof of successful completion of the examination, pursuant to Rule 18(e)(3), RLPR. BY THE COURT: Dated: September 15, 2015 David R. Stras Associate Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
