Dawn Norgren, Relator, vs. Aramark, and Lumbermen's Mutual/Specialty Risk Services, Inc., Respondents.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A08-1822 Dawn Norgren, Relator, vs. Aramark, and Lumbermen s Mutual/Specialty Risk Services, Inc., Respondents. ________________________________ Candice E. Hektner, Peterson & Hektner, Ltd., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for relator. Whitney L. Teel, James R. Waldhauser, Cousineau McGuire Chartered, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents. ________________________________ Considered and decided by the court without oral argument. ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 24, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that 1 [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Dated: January 28, 2009 BY THE COURT: /s/ Alan C. Page Associate Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
