Trudy L. Adams, Relator, vs. Hormel Foods Corporation, Self-Insured, Respondent, and Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota, Mayo Foundation, and Hormel Foods Corporation, Intervenors.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A08-236 Trudy L. Adams, Relator, vs. Hormel Foods Corporation, Self-Insured, Respondent, and Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota, Mayo Foundation, and Hormel Foods Corporation, Intervenors. Considered and decided by the court en banc. ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 8, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary 1 affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Dated: July 16, 2008. BY THE COURT: /s/ Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
