David A. Anderson, Respondent, vs. Xcel Energy, Self-Insured/G.E.Young & Company, and ACE USA/G.E. Young & Company, Relators, and Fairview Red Wing Health Services, BlueCross BlueShield of MN, University of MN Physicians, and Red Wing Corner Drug, Intervenors.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A07-2119 David A. Anderson, Respondent, vs. Xcel Energy, Self-Insured/G.E.Young & Company, and ACE USA/G.E. Young & Company, Relators, and Fairview Red Wing Health Services, BlueCross BlueShield of MN, University of MN Physicians, and Red Wing Corner Drug, Intervenors. Considered and decided by the court en banc. ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 15, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary 1 affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees. Dated: February 5, 2008 BY THE COURT: /s/ Russell A. Anderson Chief Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
