Henry L. Wilson, Relator, vs. Scanlon International, Inc., and State Fund Mutual Ins. Co., Respondents, and HealthPartners, Fairview Health Services, Allina Hospitals & Clinic/United Hospital, St. Paul Radiology, and Neurological Associates, Intervenors.

Annotate this Case
Henry L. Wilson, Relator, vs. Scanlon International, Inc., and State Fund Mutual Ins. Co., Respondents, and HealthPartners, Fairview Health Services, Allina Hospitals & Clinic/United Hospital, St. Paul Radiology, and Neurological Associates, Intervenors. A04-1862, Supreme Court Order, December 30, 2004.

 

STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT

A04-1862

 

 

Henry L. Wilson,

 

                        Relator,

 

vs.

 

Scanlon International, Inc., and

State Fund Mutual Ins. Co.,

 

                        Respondents,

 

and

 

HealthPartners,

Fairview Health Services,

Allina Hospitals & Clinic/United Hospital,

St. Paul Radiology, and

Neurological Associates,

 

                                    Intervenors.

 

 

            Considered and decided by the court en banc.

 

 

O R D E R

 

            Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 10, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion.  See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

            Dated:  December 22, 2004

 

                                                                                    BY THE COURT:

                                               

 

 

                                                                                        /s/                                                  


                                                                                    Russell A. Anderson

Associate Justice

 

 

 

            BLATZ, C.J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


    /s/                                                          

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.