Clint M. Webb, Respondent, vs. Hercules, Inc./Burns Philip, Inc., and Broadspire, f/k/a Kemper Services, Relators, and Twin Cities Bakery Drivers Health & Welfare Fund, Intervenor.

Annotate this Case
Clint M. Webb, Respondent, vs. Hercules, Inc./Burns Philip, Inc., and Broadspire, f/k/a Kemper Services, Relators, and Twin Cities Bakery Drivers Health & Welfare Fund, Intervenor. A04-1736, Supreme Court Order, December 2, 2004.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

 

IN SUPREME COURT

 

A04-1736

 

 

Clint M. Webb,

 

            Respondent,

 

vs.

 

Hercules, Inc./Burns Philip, Inc., and

Broadspire, f/k/a Kemper Services,

 

                                    Relators,

 

and

 

Twin Cities Bakery Drivers Health &

Welfare Fund,

 

                                    Intervenor.

 

 

            Considered and decided by the court en banc.

 

 

O R D E R

 

            Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 16, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion.  See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

            Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.
 
 

            Dated:  November 23, 2004

 

 

                                                                                    BY THE COURT:

                                               

 

 

                                                                                        /s/                                                          
                                                                                    Sam Hanson

Associate Justice

 

           

ANDERSON, G. Barry J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.