List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED 17 November 1998

Annotate this Case
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED NOVEMBER 17, 1999 Minnesota Supreme Court
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED
NOVEMBER 17, 1999

1. State v. Nathan Webb Clay CX-99-343 Denied 2. State v. Lupe Rosillo C1-99-19 Denied 3. Raymond Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge C4-99-161 Granted 4. State v. Richard Joseph King C5-98-1518 Denied 5. In Re the Marriage of: John F. Hall v. Eleanor M. Hall C0-99-195 Denied 6. State v. James Archie Mangan CX-98-2325 Denied 7. State v. Larry Dale Bridgeforth C8-99-633 Denied 8. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Frank S. Neises, et al. C2-98-2299 - Denied 9. Jodi Ann Montavon and Peter Brazerol v. Wellspring Adoption Agency, Inc. - C9-99-611 Denied 10. Charles Nyakundi Chonde v. State C9-99-575 Denied 11. State v. Kirk William Schaefer C3-98-2263 Denied 12. State v. James Lee Denoyer C2-98-2061 Denied 13. In the Matter of the Welfare of: M.G., S.G., and A.C. C5-99-380 Denied 14. State of Minnesota Regarding the Parties: Robert Schaps v. Judy Anderson-Schaps - C2-99-157 Denied 15. State v. Raphael Angel Cabrera C4-99-192 Denied 16. Union Bank & Trust Co., as trustee for the benefit of the Milton R. Krelitz IRA v. SuperValu, Inc. C6-99-436 Denied 17. State v. Tony Dejuan Jackson CX-98-1837 Denied 18. State v. Ralph Alvin Isaak C6-98-2239 Denied 19. State v. Chad Paul Donnay C5-99-654 Denied 20. State v. Mack Thomas C0-99-352 Denied 21. State v. Steven A. King C2-99-417 Denied 22. State v. Pedro Jumping Eagle C0-99-741 Denied 23. Margaret Schlichte, et al. v. Dale Kielan, et al. C6-99-2 Denied 24. Russell Livingood v. Renville County Board C2-99-1440 Denied 25. Melissa Brett v. Dr. Alexander Watts C5-99-492 Denied 26. Lillian Schurstein v. Selmer Law Firm, et al. C9-99-530 Denied 27. Walter Bland v. City of Minneapolis Public Works/Engineering and Traffic Division - CX-99-438 Denied

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.