In Re Petition for Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Marlon O. Haugen.
Annotate this CaseSTATE OF MINNESOTA
IN SUPREME COURT
C6-85-1544
In Re Petition for Reinstatement to the
Practice of Law of Marlon O. Haugen.
O R D E R
WHEREAS, petitioner Marlon O. Haugen was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law for a minimum of 12 months, In Re Discipline of Haugen, 543 N.W.2d 372 (Minn. 1996); and
WHEREAS, following petitioner's application for reinstatement to permanent retired status, the matter was heard by a panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board pursuant to Rule 18, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, which heard testimony from petitioner and the Director's office and had before it the Director's investigation report; and
WHEREAS, following the panel hearing, the panel issued findings of fact, conclusions, that petitioner had failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is conscious of the wrongfulness of his conduct giving rise to his discipline or that he now has the moral character and trustworthiness necessary to reassume the title of attorney and a recommendation to the court that the petition for reinstatement to permanent retired status be denied; and
WHEREAS, petitioner has informed the court that he declines to challenge the panel's report; and
WHEREAS, this court has reviewed the record and approves the recommendation of the panel,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Marlon O. Haugen for reinstatement to permanent retired status is denied.
Dated: September 21, 1998
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Alan C. Page
Associate Justice
LANCASTER, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.