Doctor's Medical Clinic, et al., pet. Appellants, vs. City of Jackson, Minnesota, d/b/a, Jackson Medical Center, et al., Respondents.

Doctor's Medical Clinic, et al., pet. Appellants, vs. City of Jackson, Minnesota, d/b/a, Jackson Medical Center, et al., Respondents. C1-97-50, C4-97-527, Supreme Court Order, July 2, 1998.

STATE OF MINNESOTA
IN SUPREME COURT

C1-97-50
C4-97-527

Doctor's Medical Clinic, et al.,

pet. Appellants,

vs.

City of Jackson, Minnesota, d/b/a,
Jackson Medical Center, et al.,

Respondents.

O R D E R

In this matter the court reviewed extensive administrative as well as judicial proceedings relating to the termination of medical privileges of appellant Gumersindo A. Alvero, M.D., by respondent Jackson Medical Center. The court of appeals affirmed the district courtis grant of summary judgment for respondents on the issue of immunity from damages under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. § 11101-52 (1994) and immunity from equitable relief under Minn. Stat. § 145.63 (1996) and awarded respondents $25,000 in attorney fees on the basis that they were substantially prevailing parties and thus entitled to attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 11113.

Because the court is evenly divided with respect to the issue of immunity, the decision of the court of appeals dated September 30, 1997 is affirmed. With respect to the award of attorney fees, however, after a careful review of the record, we believe that appellantsi claims were not frivolous, unreasonable, without foundation, or in bad faith as 42 U.S.C. § 11113 requires as a condition for awarding attorney fees and therefore we reverse the court of appealsi affirmance of the district court in this respect.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals dated September 30, 1997 is affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Dated: 6-26-98

BY THE COURT:

Kathleen A. Blatz
Chief Justice

PAGE, J. took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.