LARRY BARNETT V MARVIN BLACHURA
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
LARRY BARNETT,
UNPUBLISHED
June 16, 2005
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 252642
Oakland Circuit Court
LC No. 96-525279-CK
MARVIN BLACHURA and JUDITH
BLACHURA,
Defendants-Appellants.
Before: O’Connell, P.J., and Schuette and Borrello, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Defendants appeal by delayed leave granted from the trial court’s order setting aside the
court’s earlier judgment confirming an arbitration award. We reverse and reinstate the judgment
confirming the arbitration award.1 This case is being decided without oral argument pursuant to
MCR 7.214(E).
The trial court erred in determining that this case involved a dispute concerning title to
real estate and that arbitration was therefore precluded by MCL 600.5005.
MCL 600.5005 states, “A submission to arbitration shall not be made respecting the
claim of any person to any estate, in fee, or for life, in real estate,” except in certain situations not
applicable here. Although this action arises from a purchase agreement involving real estate,
plaintiff’s amended complaint did not assert a “claim . . . to any estate, in fee, or for life, in real
estate,” id., but rather only sought money damages for breach of contract. Further, the arbitrators
did not decide any claim involving an interest in real estate. Therefore, this case is factually
distinguishable from McFerren v B&B Investment Group, 233 Mich App 505, 513; 592 NW2d
782 (1999), which, as an action to quiet title, clearly involved a dispute concerning an interest in
real estate. Because the case at bar does not involve title to land, the trial court erred in
determining that arbitration was precluded by MCL 600.5005.
1
This is the parties’ second appearance before this Court. In Barnett v Blachura, 242 Mich App
395; 618 NW2d 777 (2000), we reversed the trial court’s determination that it lacked subjectmatter jurisdiction over this dispute because of bankruptcy proceedings.
-1-
Reversed and remanded for reinstatement of the judgment confirming the arbitration
award. We do not retain jurisdiction.
/s/ Peter D. O’Connell
/s/ Bill Schuette
/s/ Stephen L. Borrello
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
