PEOPLE OF MI V GEVON RAMON DAVIS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
November 25, 2003
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
No. 242207
Genesee Circuit Court
LC No. 02-009635-FH
GEVON RAMON DAVIS,
Defendant-Appellee.
Before: Cooper, P.J., and Markey and Meter, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The prosecutor appeals as of right from a circuit court order granting defendant’s motion
to quash on double jeopardy grounds. We affirm. This appeal is being decided without oral
argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
In August 2001, defendant either stole a car or received possession of the vehicle which
had been stolen by someone else. He drove the vehicle to Kentucky, where he was apprehended
and charged with theft by unlawful taking or disposition over $300. Ky Rev Stat Ann 514.030.
Defendant pled guilty to an added charge of attempted theft by unlawful taking and was
sentenced to one year in jail. Defendant was charged in Michigan with unlawfully driving away
a motor vehicle, MCL 750.413, or receiving and concealing stolen property over $1,000 and
under $20,000, MCL 750.535(3)(a). These charges stem from the same event that led to the
criminal proceedings in Kentucky.
The trial court held that under the rule governing successive prosecutions in different
jurisdictions enunciated in People v Cooper, 398 Mich 450, 460-461; 247 NW2d 866 (1976),
prosecution in this state violated the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The
prosecutor does not take issue with that ruling per se. He contends only that this Court should
take the opportunity to follow People v Mezy, 453 Mich 269, 280-281; 551 NW2d 389 (1996), in
which three Justices voted to overrule Cooper.
Although Justice Cavanagh has opined that Cooper’s continuing validity is suspect,
People v Hermiz, 462 Mich 71, 87; 611 NW2d 783 (2000), it is still the law. See People v
Mackle, 241 Mich App 583, 594; 617 NW2d 339 (2000). “While the Court of Appeals may
properly express its belief that a decision of [the Supreme] Court was wrongly decided or is no
longer viable,” Boyd v W G Wade Shows, 443 Mich 515, 523; 505 NW2d 544 (1993), “a
-1-
decision of the majority of justices of the Michigan Supreme Court is binding on lower courts[,]”
including this Court. People v Beasley, 239 Mich App 548, 559; 609 NW2d 581 (2000).
Affirmed.
/s/ Jessica R. Cooper
/s/ Jane E. Markey
/s/ Patrick M. Meter
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.