GARY VALLIE V COLONIAL VILLAGE COOP

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS GARY VALLIE, UNPUBLISHED February 4, 2000 Plaintiff-Appellant, v COLONIAL VILLAGE COOPERATIVE, DAVID M. RUDICIL, COLONIAL VILLAGE COOPERATIVE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, BRIAN DUNCAN, CHARLES BLANCHETTE, RONALD BAKER, LINDA PERRY, WILLIAM DIEBOLD, GLENN KIRKHAM, and PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DIVERSIFIED, No. 212823 Wayne Circuit Court LC No. 92-221731-NZ Defendants-Appellees. Before: White, P.J., and Sawyer and Griffin, JJ. MEMORANDUM. On January 25, 1994, the circuit court entered an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants “for reasons set forth on the record by this Honorable Court on January 21, 1994.” However, in its ruling from the bench, the circuit court did not address plaintiff’s claim of breach of contract. On April 29, 1994, this Court remanded to the circuit court “for consideration of the motion for injunctive relief and/or stay of proceedings.” After plaintiff stipulated to dismissal of his motion for injunctive relief, the case returned to our Court which denied plaintiff’s delayed application for leave to appeal for lack of merit in the grounds presented. The case now returns to this Court pursuant to an order of the Supreme Court which remands “for consideration as on leave granted the issue whether summary disposition was properly granted on plaintiff’s breach of contract claim.” Because there was no ruling by the circuit court on plaintiff’s breach of contract claim, we find it necessary in light of the order of the Supreme Court to remand to the circuit court for the purpose of making a ruling on plaintiff’s breach of contract claim. The lower court is instructed to state its reasons for the ruling on the record or in a written opinion. MCR 7.216(A)(7). -1­ Remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. /s/ Helene N. White /s/ David H. Sawyer /s/ Richard Allen Griffin -2­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.