IN RE LANIER MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of GEORGE LONDON LANIER and
JUSTIN JOHN LANIER, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
November 12, 1999
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 212361
Wayne Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 96-341604
ANGELA LENORA LANIER,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
DARRYL WILLIAMS and TOMMY HOUSTON,
Respondents.
Before: Whitbeck, P.J., and Gribbs and White, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the family court order terminating her parental
rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (g) and (j); MSA
27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i), (g) and (j). We affirm. This case is being decided without oral argument
pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
The family court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were
established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445
NW2d 161 (1989). Given respondent-appellant’s failure to overcome her long-standing drug
addiction, and failure to benefit from the services provided, it was not reasonably likely that respondent
appellant would be able to provide proper care and custody for the children within a reasonable period
of time, considering their ages. Further, respondent-appellant failed to show that termination of her
-1
parental rights was clearly not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA
27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997).
Thus, the family court did not err in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental rights to the children.
Id.
Affirmed.
/s/ William C. Whitbeck
/s/ Roman S. Gribbs
/s/ Helene N. White
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.